Improving the diagnosis and classification of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms through deep phenotyping
Sirinukunwattana, K.; Aberdeen, A.; Theissen, H.; Sousos, N.; Psaila, B.; Mead, A.; Turner, G.; Rees, G.; Rittscher, J.; Royston, D.
Show abstract
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders characterized by excessive proliferation of myeloid lineages. Accurate classification and appropriate management of MPNs requires integration of clinical, morphological and genetic findings. Despite major advances in understanding the molecular and genetic basis, morphological assessment of the bone marrow trephine (BMT) remains paramount in differentiating between MPN subtypes and reactive conditions. However, morphological assessment is heavily constrained by a reliance on subjective, qualitative and poorly reproducible criteria. To address this, we have developed a machine-learning strategy for the automated identification and quantitative analysis of megakaryocyte morphology using clinical BMT samples. Using a sample cohort of recently diagnosed or established ET (n = 48) and reactive control cases (n = 42) we demonstrated a high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.95) of automated tissue ET diagnosis based upon these specific megakaryocyte phenotypes. These separate morphological phenotypes showed evidence of specific genotype associations, which offers promise that an automated cell phenotyping approach may be of clinical diagnostic utility as an adjunct to standard genetic and molecular tests. This has great potential to assist in the routine assessment of newly diagnosed or suspected MPN patients and those undergoing treatment / clinical follow-up. The extraction of quantitative morphological data from BMT sections will also have value in the assessment of new therapeutic strategies directed towards the bone marrow microenvironment and can provide clinicians and researchers with objective, quantitative data without significant demands upon current routine specimen workflows.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the identity and regulators of human mast cell progenitors 94%
- Neutrophil transit time and localization within the megakaryocyte define morphologically distinct forms of emperipolesis 93%
- Molecular mechanisms promoting long-term cytopenia after BCMA CAR-T therapy in Multiple Myeloma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Deep Learning-Based Diagnosis and Molecular Characterization of Acute Myeloid Leukemia using Flow Cytometry 93%
- NKG2C Improves Diagnostic Specificity of NK Cell Receptor Restriction by Identifying Non-Neoplastic Adaptive NK Cell Clones 90%
- Artificial intelligence-driven morphology-based enrichment of malignant cells from body fluid 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous Indexing of Fibrosis (CIF): Improving the Assessment and Classification of MPN Patients 97%
- Mapping AML heterogeneity – multi-cohort transcriptomic analysis identifies novel clusters and divergent ex-vivo drug responses 92%
- Srsf2P95H/+ co-operates with loss of TET2 to promote myeloid bias and initiate a chronic myelomonocytic leukemia like disease in mice. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dual T-cell constant β chain (TRBC)1 and TRBC2 staining for the identification of T-cell neoplasms by flow cytometry 93%
- Real World Predictors of Response and 24-month survival in high-grade TP53 -mutated Myeloid Neoplasms 91%
- High WEE1 expression is independently linked to poor survival in multiple myeloma 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of myeloid malignant cells in Fanconi anemia using machine learning 93%
- Scalable In Vitro Production of Defined Mouse Erythroblasts 93%
- Analytical validation and performance characteristics of a 48-gene next-generation sequencing panel for detecting potentially actionable genomic alterations in myeloid neoplasms 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.