Back

Improving the diagnosis and classification of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms through deep phenotyping

Sirinukunwattana, K.; Aberdeen, A.; Theissen, H.; Sousos, N.; Psaila, B.; Mead, A.; Turner, G.; Rees, G.; Rittscher, J.; Royston, D.

2019-09-11 pathology
10.1101/762013 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders characterized by excessive proliferation of myeloid lineages. Accurate classification and appropriate management of MPNs requires integration of clinical, morphological and genetic findings. Despite major advances in understanding the molecular and genetic basis, morphological assessment of the bone marrow trephine (BMT) remains paramount in differentiating between MPN subtypes and reactive conditions. However, morphological assessment is heavily constrained by a reliance on subjective, qualitative and poorly reproducible criteria. To address this, we have developed a machine-learning strategy for the automated identification and quantitative analysis of megakaryocyte morphology using clinical BMT samples. Using a sample cohort of recently diagnosed or established ET (n = 48) and reactive control cases (n = 42) we demonstrated a high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.95) of automated tissue ET diagnosis based upon these specific megakaryocyte phenotypes. These separate morphological phenotypes showed evidence of specific genotype associations, which offers promise that an automated cell phenotyping approach may be of clinical diagnostic utility as an adjunct to standard genetic and molecular tests. This has great potential to assist in the routine assessment of newly diagnosed or suspected MPN patients and those undergoing treatment / clinical follow-up. The extraction of quantitative morphological data from BMT sections will also have value in the assessment of new therapeutic strategies directed towards the bone marrow microenvironment and can provide clinicians and researchers with objective, quantitative data without significant demands upon current routine specimen workflows.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.6%
2
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
4
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
10
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
27
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%