Genetic diversity and haplotypic structure of a Saudi population sample using Investigator Argus X-12 amplification kit
Messaoudi, S. A.; Ramesh, S.; Alsaleh, A.; Albajjah, M.; Alsnan, N.
Show abstract
X-chromosome short tandem repeat (X-STR) markers have shown a great capability in forensic identity investigations and paternity testing involving kinship analysis.\n\nIn the current study, the distribution of 12 X-STR loci located in four linkage groups was evaluated using Investigator(R) Argus X-12 Amplification Kit in 200 unrelated healthy individuals (105 males and 95 females) from the central region of the Saudi Arabia in order to create a DNA database.\n\nOur results indicated that DXS10146 locus was the most informative with 21 alleles while DXS8378 locus was the least with five alleles. Forensic parameters showed that all X-STRs loci either as individual markers or as linkage groups provide genetic information with high discrimination that is appropriate for forensic purposes with Paternity Informed Consent (PIC), Power of exclusion (PE), and Paternity index (PI) varied from 0.61211 to 0.917979, 0.38722 to 0.842949, and 0.038416 to 0.16367, respectively. A significant Linkage disequilibrium (LD) with p-value after Bonferroni correction p [≤] 0.05/66= 0.0008 was observed for 17 pairs of loci in male samples and 4 pairs of loci in female. In the male group, LG3 showed relatively high values of Haplotype diversity. The pairwise genetic distance fixation index (Fst) results showed that the Saudi population is genetically close to the Egyptian and Emirati populations and distant to the Turkish population.\n\nThe current study revealed that Investigator(R) Argus 12 X-STR kit would support forensic application, kinship testing involving female offspring, and human identification in Saudi populations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic admixture patterns in Argentinian Patagonia 95%
- Evaluation of intron-1 of odorant-binding protein-1 of Anopheles stephensi as a marker for the identification of biological forms or putative sibling species 95%
- Genetic connectivity and diversity of endangered species the scalloped hammerhead shark Sphyrna lewini (Griffith & Smith 1834) population in Indonesia and Western Indian Ocean 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Complete genome sequence and analysis of nine Egyptian females with clinical information from different geographic regions in Egypt 92%
- Systems Biology under heat stress in Indian Cattle 92%
- Improving the phylogenetic resolution of Malaysian and Javan mahseer (Cyprinidae), Tor tambroides and Tor tambra: Whole mitogenomes sequencing, phylogeny and potential mitogenome markers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening and selection of 21 novel microhaplotype markers for ancestry inference in ten Chinese Subpopulations 93%
- Levenshtein Distance as a Measure of Accuracy and Precision in Forensic PCR-MPS Methods 93%
- Weight of evidence of Y-STR matches computed with the discrete Laplace method: Impact of adding a suspect's profile to a reference database 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of an STR panel for a non-native population of an endangered species 95%
- Development of microsatellite markers for the threatened species Coleocephalocereus purpureus (Cactaceae) using next-generation sequencing 92%
- A Rapid and Low-Cost protocol for the detection of B.1.1.7 lineage of SARS-CoV-2 by using SYBR Green-Based RT-qPCR 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic association of TMPRSS2 rs2070788 polymorphism with COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate among Indian populations 93%
- Functional prediction and comparative population analysis of variants in genes for proteases and innate immunity related to SARS-CoV-2 infection 92%
- Protein interaction analysis of Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein variants with human immunoproteins explains RTS,S vaccine efficacy in Ghana 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.