High-sensitivity monitoring of ctDNA by patient-specific sequencing panels and integration of variant reads
Wan, J. C.; Heider, K.; Gale, D.; Murphy, S.; Fisher, E.; Morris, J.; Mouliere, F.; Chandrananda, D.; Marshall, A.; Gill, A. B.; Chan, P. Y.; Barker, E.; Young, G.; Cooper, W. N.; Hudecova, I.; Marass, F.; Bignell, G. R.; Alifrangis, C.; Middleton, M. R.; Gallagher, F. A.; Parkinson, C.; Durrani, A.; McDermott, U.; Smith, C. G.; Massie, C.; Corrie, P. G.; Rosenfeld, N.
Show abstract
Circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) can be used to monitor cancer dynamics noninvasively. Patients with small tumors have few copies of ctDNA in plasma, resulting in limited sensitivity to detect low-volume or residual disease. We show that sampling limitations can be overcome and sensitivity for ctDNA detection can be improved by massively parallel sequencing when hundreds to thousands of mutations are identified by tumor genotyping. We describe the INtegration of VAriant Reads (INVAR) analysis pipeline, which combines patient-specific mutation lists with both custom error-suppression methods and signal enrichment based on biological features of ctDNA. In this framework, the sensitivity can be estimated independently for each sample based on the number of informative reads, which is the product of the number of mutations analyzed and the average depth of unique sequencing reads. We applied INVAR to deep sequencing data generated by custom hybrid-capture panels, and showed that when ~106 informative reads were obtained INVAR allowed detection of tumor-derived DNA fractions to parts per million (ppm). In serial samples from patients with advanced melanoma on treatment, we detected ctDNA when imaging confirmed tumor volume of ~1cm3. In patients with resected early-stage melanoma, ctDNA was detected in 40% of patients who later relapsed, with higher rates of detection when more informative reads were obtained. We further demonstrated that INVAR can be generalized and allows improved detection of ctDNA from whole-exome and low-depth whole-genome sequencing data.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive benchmarking of methods for mutation calling in circulating tumor DNA 95%
- Cross-dataset pan-cancer detection: Correlating cell-free DNA fragment coverage with open chromatin sites across cell types 95%
- Deactivation of ligand-receptor interactions enhancing lymphocyte infiltration drives melanoma resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer Drivers are Recurrent Transcriptional Regulatory Heterogeneities in Early-stage Luminal Breast Cancer 95%
- Premalignant Nf1,Trp53-null Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells BecomeStalled in a Heterogeneous State of Replication Stress BeforeGliomagenesis 94%
- Neoplastic immune mimicry potentiates breast tumor progression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mathematical model of ctDNA shedding predicts tumor detection size 94%
- Comprehensive genetic diagnosis of tandem repeat expansion disorders with programmable targeted nanopore sequencing 94%
- Integrating Single-Cell Biophysical and Transcriptomic Features to Resolve Functional Heterogeneity in Mantle Cell Lymphoma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Burden of tumor mutations, neoepitopes, and other variants are dubious predictors of cancer immunotherapy response and overall survival 96%
- Constructing germline research cohorts from the discarded reads of clinical tumor sequences 95%
- Multi-scale characterisation of homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.