Back

A precision virtual crossmatch decision support system for interpretation of ambiguous molecular HLA typing data

Kaur, N.; Pinelli, D.; Kransdorf, E.; Pando, M.; Smith, G.; Murphey, C.; Kamoun, M.; Bray, R.; Tambur, A.; Gragert, L.

2019-09-05 immunology
10.1101/756809 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Virtual crossmatch (VXM) compares a transplant candidates unacceptable antigens to the HLA typing of the donor before an organ offer is accepted and, in selected cases, supplant a prospective physical crossmatch. However, deceased donor typing can be ambiguous, leading to uncertainty in compatibility prediction. We have developed a web application that utilizes ambiguous HLA molecular typing data to assist in VXM assessments. The application compares a candidates listed unacceptable antigens to computed probabilities of all possible two-field donor HLA alleles and UNOS antigens. The VIrtual CrossmaTch for mOleculaR HLA typing (VICTOR) tool can be accessed at http://www.transplanttoolbox.org/victor. We reanalyzed historical VXM cases where a transplant centers manual interpretation of molecular typing results influenced offer evaluation. We found that VICTORs automated interpretation of ambiguous donor molecular typing data would influence VXM decisions. Standardized interpretation of molecular typing data, if applied to the match run, could also change which offers are made. HLA typing ambiguity has been an underappreciated source of immunological risk in organ transplantation. The VICTOR tool can serve as a testbed for development of allocation policies with the aim of decreasing offers refused due to HLA incompatibility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
2
Transfusion
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
4
Cytotherapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Immunogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
6
American Journal of Transplantation
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
STAR Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
10
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
npj Vaccines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
17
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
Kidney International Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
20
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
27
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%