Back

Male song sparrows modulate their aggressive signaling in response to plumage signals: experiments with 3-D printed models

Beck, M. L.; Akcay, C.; Sewall, K. B.

2019-09-04 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/753772 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Competitive interactions among conspecifics are often resolved by assessing signals that honestly indicate individual fighting ability or dominance. In territorial species, signals of competitive ability are thought to function primarily during the early stages of territory establishment, but recent evidence suggests that these signals continue to influence interactions with floaters and neighbors well after territory establishment. Here, we examine the influence of the extent of chest spotting displayed by an intruding male on the response of territorial male song sparrows. We exposed males to 3-D printed models with large or small spotting area coupled with conspecific playback and recorded their behavior. We also assessed the response of a subset of males to both the 3-D printed models and a traditional, taxidermic mount to ensure the 3-D models were a realistic stimulus. We found no differences in the number of attacks or proximity to the model due to spotting area. However, territorial males produced more soft songs and tended to sing fewer loud songs, both of which predict attack in our population, in response to the model with less chest spotting. One possibility is that males with less chest spotting elicit a stronger response because they are seen as a greater threat. Based on our previous findings in this system, we think it is more likely that models with less chest spotting are perceived as subordinate and therefore easier to defeat, leading to a stronger response by territory holders. We found males were equally likely to attack 3-D printed models and a taxidermic mount but signaled more aggressively during trials with the taxidermic mount than the 3-D printed models. This suggests that birds recognized the 3-D models as meaningful stimuli but that the use of 3-D printed models should be validated through comparison to a traditional taxidermic mount when possible.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.8%
3
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
5
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%