Implicit versus explicit control strategies in models for vector-borne disease epidemiology
Demers, J.; Robertson, S. L.; Bewick, S.; Fagan, W. F.
Show abstract
Throughout the vector-borne disease modeling literature, there exist two general frameworks for incorporating vector management strategies (e.g. area-wide adulticide spraying and larval source reduction campaigns) into vector population models, namely, the \"implicit\" and \"explicit\" control frameworks. The more simplistic \"implicit\" framework facilitates derivation of mathematically rigorous results on disease suppression and optimal control, but the biological connection of these results to realworld \"explicit\" control actions that could guide specific management actions is vague at best. Here, we formally define the biological and mathematical relationships between implicit and explicit control, and we provide detailed mathematical expressions relating the strength of implicit control to management-relevant properties of explicit control for four common intervention strategies. These expressions allow optimal control and sensitivity analysis results in existing implicit control studies to be interpreted in terms of real world actions. Our work reveals a previously unknown fact: implicit control is a meaningful approximation of explicit control only when resonance-like synergistic effects between multiple controls have a negligible effect on average population reduction. When non-negligible synergy exists, implicit control results, despite their mathematical tidiness, fail to provide accurate predictions regarding vector control and disease spread. The methodology we establish can be applied to study the interaction of phenological effects with control strategies, and we present a new technique for finding impulse control strategies that optimally reduce a vector population in the presence of seasonally oscillating model parameters. Collectively, these elements build an effective bridge between analytically interesting and mathematically tractable implicit control and the challenging, action-oriented explicit control.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Will an outbreak exceed available resources for control? Estimating the risk from invading pathogens using practical definitions of a severe epidemic 96%
- Misinformation can prevent the suppression of epidemics 96%
- The Complex Interplay Between Risk Tolerance and the Spread of Infectious Diseases 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics in Denmark, February through October 2020: Nature of the past epidemic and how it may develop in the future 96%
- Downsizing of contact tracing during COVID-19 vaccine roll-out 96%
- A note on variable susceptibility, the herd-immunity threshold and modeling of infectious diseases 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing the Timing and Composition of Therapeutic Phage Cocktails: A Control-theoretic Approach 96%
- Modelling Immune Dynamics in Locally Advanced MSI-H/dMMR Colorectal Cancer with Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Treatment: From Differential Equations to an Agent-Based Framework 96%
- How local interactions impact the dynamics of an epidemic 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.