Back

The periphery and the core properties explain the omnigenic model in the human interactome

Wang, B.; Glass, K.; Rohl, A.; Santolini, M.; Croteau-Chonka, D. C.; Weiss, S. T.; Raby, B.; Sharma, A.

2019-08-29 systems biology
10.1101/749358 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the connectivity patterns of genes in a localized disease neighborhood or disease module in a molecular interaction network (interactome) is a key step toward advancing the knowledge about molecular mechanisms underlying a complex disease. In this work, we introduce a framework that detects peripheral and core regions of a disease in the human interactome. We leverage gene expression data on 104 diseases and analyze the connectivity of differentially expressed genes (quantified by a p-value < 0.05) and their topological membership in the network to distinguish between peripheral and core genes. Per definition, peripheral and core genes are topologically different and we show that they also differ biologically. Core genes are more enriched for Genome-wide association study (GWAS) and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) data, whereas peripheral genes are more shared across different disease states and their overlap helps predict disease proximity in the human interactome. Based on this observation, we propose a flower model to explain the organization of genes in the human interactome, with core genes of different diseases as the petals and the peripheral genes as the (shared) stem. We show that this network model is an important step towards finding novel drug targets and improving disease classification. Overall, we were able to demonstrate how perturbations percolate through the human interactome and contribute to peripheral and core regions, an important novel feature of the omnigenic model.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.