Electrophysiological evidence for impaired auditory sensory memory in Cystinosis despite typical sensory processing: An MMN investigation
Alves Francisco, A.; Foxe, J. J.; Horsthuis, D. J.; Molholm, S.
Show abstract
Cystinosis, a genetic rare disease characterized by cystine accumulation and crystallization, results in significant damage in a multitude of tissues and organs, such as the kidney, thyroid, eye, and brain. While Cystinosis impact on brain function is relatively mild compared to its effects on other organs, the increased lifespan of this population and thus potential for productive societal contributions have led to increased interest on the effects on brain function. Nevertheless, and despite some evidence of structural brain differences, the neural impact of the mutation is still not well characterized.\n\nHere, using a passive duration oddball paradigm (with different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), representing different levels of demand on memory) and high-density electrophysiology, we tested basic auditory processing in a group of 22 children and adolescents diagnosed with Cystinosis (age range: 6-17 years old) and in neurotypical age-matched controls (N=24). We examined whether the N1 and mismatch negativity (MMN) significantly differed between the groups and if those neural measures correlated with verbal and non-verbal IQ. Individuals diagnosed with Cystinosis presented similar N1 responses to their age-matched peers, indicating typical basic auditory processing in this population. However, whereas both groups showed similar MMN responses for the shortest (450ms) SOA, suggesting intact change detection and sensory memory, individuals diagnosed with Cystinosis presented clearly reduced responses for the longer (900ms and 1800ms) SOAs. This could indicate reduced duration auditory sensory memory traces, and thus sensory memory impairment, in children and adolescents diagnosed with Cystinosis. Future work addressing other aspects of sensory and working memory is needed to understand the underlying bases of the differences described here, and their implication for higher order processing.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinctive neural correlates of phonological processing and reading impairment in fetal alcohol-exposed adolescents with and without facial dysmorphology 93%
- Perceptual and semantic deficits in face recognition in semantic dementia 92%
- Motivationally salient cue processing measured using the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task with electroencephalography (EEG): A potential marker of apathy in Huntington’s Disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The auditory Mismatch Negativity reflects accelerated aging in adults with Down’s Syndrome 94%
- Temporal dynamics of cognitive flexibility in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a high density EEG study 93%
- Cerebral laterality for writing in right- and left-handers: A functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive compensation of arcuate fasciculus lateralization in developmental dyslexia 93%
- Simultaneous auditory agnosia: Systematic description of a new type of auditory segregation deficit following a right hemisphere lesion 92%
- Lateralized deficits in arousal processing after insula lesions: behavioral and autonomic evidence 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early evoked brain activity underlies auditory and audiovisual speech recognition deficits in schizophrenia 93%
- Linking alpha oscillations, attention and inhibitory control in adult ADHD with EEG neurofeedback 92%
- Structural changes to primary visual cortex in the congenital absence of cone input in achromatopsia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.