Practical Aspects of Phylogenetic Network Analysis Using PhyloNet
Cao, Z.; Liu, X.; Ogilvie, H. A.; Yan, Z.; Nakhleh, L.
Show abstract
Phylogenetic networks extend trees to enable simultaneous modeling of both vertical and horizontal evolutionary processes. PhyloNet is a software package that has been under constant development for over 10 years and includes a wide array of functionalities for inferring and analyzing phylogenetic networks. These functionalities differ in terms of the input data they require, the criteria and models they employ, and the types of information they allow to infer about the networks beyond their topologies. Furthermore, PhyloNet includes functionalities for simulating synthetic data on phylogenetic networks, quantifying the topological differences between phylogenetic networks, and evaluating evolutionary hypotheses given in the form of phylogenetic networks.\n\nIn this paper, we use a simulated data set to illustrate the use of several of PhyloNets functionalities and make recommendations on how to analyze data sets and interpret the results when using these functionalities. All inference methods that we illustrate are incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) aware; that is, they account for the potential of ILS in the data while inferring the phylogenetic network. While the models do not include gene duplication and loss, we discuss how the methods can be used to analyze data in the presence of polyploidy.\n\nThe concept of species is irrelevant for the computational analyses enabled by PhyloNet in that species-individuals mappings are user-defined. Consequently, none of the functionalities in PhyloNet deals with the task of species delimitation. In this sense, the data being analyzed could come from different individuals within a single species, in which case population structure along with potential gene flow is inferred (assuming the data has sufficient signal), or from different individuals sampled from different species, in which case the species phylogeny is being inferred.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Insertions and deletions as phylogenetic signal in alignment-free sequence comparison 97%
- An assembly-free method of phylogeny reconstruction using short-read sequences from pooled samples without barcodes 96%
- LinguaPhylo: a probabilistic model specification language for reproducible phylogenetic analyses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.