Back

Robust Hi-C chromatin loop maps in human neurogenesis and brain tissues at high-resolution

LU, L.; Liu, X.; Huang, W.-K.; Giusti-Rodriguez, P.; Cui, J.; Zhang, S.; Xu, W.; Wen, Z.; Ma, S.; Rosen, J. D.; Xu, Z.; Bartels, C.; Riki Kawaguchi, R.; Hu, M.; Scacheri, P.; Rong, Z.; Li, Y.; Sullivan, P. F.; Song, H.; Ming, G.-l.; Li, Y.; Jin, F.

2019-08-22 genomics
10.1101/744540 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide mapping of chromatin interactions at high resolution remains experimentally and computationally challenging. Here we used a low-input \"easy Hi-C\" (eHi-C) protocol to map the 3D genome architecture in neurogenesis and brain tissues, and also developed an improved Hi-C bias-correction pipeline (HiCorr) enabling better identification of enhancer loops or aggregates at sub-TAD level. We compared ultra-deep 3D genome maps from 10 human tissue- or cell types, with a focus on stem cells and neural development. We found several large loci in skin-derived human iPSC lines showing recurrent 3D compartmental memory of somatic heterochromatin. Chromatin loop interactions, but not genome compartments, are hallmarks of neural differentiation. Interestingly, we observed many cell type- or differentiation-specific enhancer aggregates spanning large neighborhoods, supporting a phase-separation mechanism that stabilizes enhancer contacts during development. Finally, we demonstrated that chromatin loop outperforms eQTL in explaining neurological GWAS results, revealing a unique value of high-resolution 3D genome maps in elucidating the disease etiology.\n\nHighlightsO_LILow input \"easy Hi-C\" protocol compatible with 50-100K cells\nC_LIO_LIImproved Hi-C bias correction allows direct observation and accurate identification of sub-TAD chromatin loops and enhancer aggregates\nC_LIO_LIRecurrent architectural memory of somatic heterochromatin at compartment level in skin-derived hiPSCs\nC_LIO_LIChromatin loop, but not genome compartment, marks neural differentiation\nC_LIO_LIChromatin loop outperforms eQTL in defining brain GWAS target genes\nC_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.