Superfast periodicities in distress vocalizations emitted by bats
Hechavarria, J. C.; Beetz, M. J.; Garcia-Rosales, F.; Koessl, M.
Show abstract
Communication sounds are ubiquitous in the animal kingdom, where they play a role in advertising physiological states and/or socio-contextual scenarios. Distress sounds, for example, are typically uttered in distressful scenarios such as agonistic interactions. Here, we report on the occurrence of superfast temporal periodicities in distress calls emitted by bats (species Carollia perspicillata). Distress vocalizations uttered by this bat species are temporally modulated at frequencies close to 1.7 kHz, that is, [~]17 times faster than modulation rates observed in human screams. Fast temporal periodicities are represented in the bats brain by means of frequency following responses, and temporally periodic sounds are more effective in boosting the heart rate of awake bats than their demodulated versions. Altogether, our data suggest that bats, an animal group classically regarded as ultrasonic, can exploit the low frequency portion of the soundscape during distress calling to create spectro-temporally complex, arousing sounds.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual awareness of near-threshold tones scales gradually with auditory cortex activity and pupil dilation 95%
- Temporal-Coherence Induces Binding in Responses to Sound Sequences in Ferret Auditory Cortex 92%
- ARBUR, a machine learning-based analysis system for relating behaviors and ultrasonic vocalizations of rats 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frontal cortex activity underlying the production of diverse vocal signals during social communication in marmoset monkeys 94%
- Spatiotemporal brain hierarchies of auditory memory recognition and predictive coding 94%
- Spectro-temporal acoustical markers differentiate speech from song across cultures 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.