Back

Identification of Escherichia coli ClpAP in regulating susceptibility to type VI secretion system-mediated attack by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Lin, H.-H.; Yu, M.; Sriramoju, M. K.; Hsu, S.-T. D.; Liu, C.-T.; Lai, E.-M.

2019-08-14 microbiology
10.1101/734046 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Type VI secretion system (T6SS) is an effector delivery system used by gram-negative bacteria to kill other bacteria or eukaryotic host to gain fitness. In Agrobacterium tumefaciens, T6SS has been shown to kill other bacteria such as Escherichia coli. Interestingly, the A. tumefaciens T6SS killing efficiency differs when using different E. coli strains as recipient cells. Thus, we hypothesize that a successful T6SS killing not only relies on attacker T6SS activity but also depends on recipient factors. A high-throughput interbacterial competition assay was employed to test the hypothesis by screening for mutants with reduced killing outcomes caused by A. tumefaciens strain C58. From the 3909 E. coli Keio mutants screened, 16 candidate mutants were filtered out. One strain, {Delta}clpP::Kan, showed ten times more resistant to T6SS-mediating killing but restored its susceptibility when complemented with clpP in trans. ClpP is a universal and highly conserved protease that exists in both prokaryotes and eukaryotic organelles. In E. coli, ClpP uses either ClpA or ClpX as an adaptor for substrate specificity. Therefore, the susceptibility of the {Delta}clpA::Kan and {Delta}clpX::Kan was also tested. The T6SS attack susceptibility of {Delta}clpA::Kan is at the same level as {Delta}clpP::Kan, while {Delta}clpX::Kan showed no difference as compared to that of wild-type E. coli BW25113. The data also suggest that ClpA-ClpP interaction, rather than its protease activity, is responsible for enhancing susceptibility to T6SS killing. This study highlights the importance of recipient factors in determining the outcome of T6SS killing.

Published in Frontiers in Microbiology (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.