Back

Utility of the Onchocerca volvulus mitochondrial genome for delineation of parasite transmission zones

Crawford, K. E.; Hedtke, S. M.; Doyle, S. R.; Kuesel, A. C.; Armoo, S.; Osei-Atweneboana, M.; Grant, W. N.

2019-08-12 evolutionary biology
10.1101/732446 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In 2012, the reduction in Onchocerca volvulus infection prevalence through long-term mass ivermectin distribution in African meso- and hyperendemic areas motivated expanding control of onchocerciasis (river blindness) as a public health problem to elimination of parasite transmission. Given the large contiguous hypo-, meso- and hyperendemic areas with an estimated population of 204 million, sustainable elimination requires an understanding of the geographic, and in turn genetic, boundaries of different parasite populations to ensure interventions are only stopped where the risk of re-introduction of the parasite through vector or human migration from areas with ongoing transmission is acceptable. These boundaries, which define the transmission zones of the parasite, may be delineated by characterising the parasite genetic population structure within and between potential zones. We analysed whole mitochondrial genome sequences of 189 O. volvulus adults to determine the pattern of genetic similarity across three West African countries: Ghana, Mali, and Cote dIvoire. Population structure measures indicate that parasites from the Pru, Daka and Black Volta/Tombe river basins in central Ghana belong to one parasite population, showing that different river basins cannot be assumed to constitute independent transmission zones. This research forms the basis for developing tools for elimination programs to delineate transmission zones, to estimate the risk of parasite re-introduction via vector or human movement when mass ivermectin administration is stopped in one area while transmission is ongoing in others, to identify the origin of infections detected post-treatment cessation, and to investigate whether migration contributes to persisting prevalence levels during interventions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal for Parasitology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.9%
3
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.3%
5
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
8
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
Journal of Medical Entomology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
13
International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
15
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%