Efficient multiplex genome editing using CRISPR-Mb3Cas12a in mice
Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Gorzalski, A. J.; McSwiggin, H.; Yu, T.; Castaneda-Garcia, K.; Zheng, H.; Yan, W.
Show abstract
Despite many advantages over Cas9, Cas12a has not been widely used in genome editing in mammalian cells largely due to its strict requirement of the TTTV protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence. Here, we report that Mb3Cas12a (Moraxella bovoculi AAX11_00205) could edit the genome in murine zygotes independent of TTTV PAM sequences and with minimal on-target mutations and close to 100% editing efficiency when crRNAs of 23nt spacers were used.\n\nSummary statementCRISPR-Mb3Cas12a can target a broader range of sequences in murine zygotes compared to AsCas12a and LbCas12a, and has lower on-target effects than Cas9 and high overall knock-in efficiency.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lin28a/let-7 Pathway Modulates the Hox Code via Polycomb Regulation during Axial Patterning in Vertebrates 95%
- Highly efficient generation of isogenic pluripotent stem cell models using prime editing 94%
- Marcks and Marcks-like 1 proteins promote spinal cord development and regeneration in Xenopus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Necessity of integrated genomic analysis to establish a designed knock-in mouse from CRISPR-Cas9-induced mutants 94%
- Induction of an immortalized songbird cell line allows for gene characterization and knockout by CRISPR-Cas9 93%
- Ets2 frame-shift mutant models express in-frame mRNA by exon skipping that complements Ets2 function in the skin 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- CRISPR-Cas9 HDR Optimization: RAD52, Denatured and 5'-Modified DNA Templates in Knock-In Mice Generation 94%
- δ-protocadherins control neural progenitor cell proliferation by antagonizing Ryk and Wnt/β-catenin signaling 93%
- Elements of divergence in germline determination in closely related species 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.