A size principle for leg motor control in Drosophila
Azevedo, A. W.; Gurung, P.; Venkatasubramanian, L.; Mann, R.; Tuthill, J. C.
Show abstract
To move the body, the brain must precisely coordinate patterns of activity among diverse populations of motor neurons. In many species, including vertebrates, the motor neurons innervating a given muscle fire in a specific order that is determined by a gradient of cellular size and electrical excitability. This hierarchy allows premotor circuits to recruit motor neurons of increasing force capacity in a task-dependent manner. However, it remains unclear whether such a size principle also applies to species with more compact motor systems, such as the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, which has just 53 motor neurons per leg. Using in vivo calcium imaging and electrophysiology, we found that genetically-identified motor neurons controlling flexion of the fly tibia exhibit a gradient of anatomical, physiological, and functional properties consistent with the size principle. Large, fast motor neurons control high force, ballistic movements while small, slow motor neurons control low force, postural movements. Intermediate neurons fall between these two extremes. In behaving flies, motor neurons are recruited in order from slow to fast. This hierarchical organization suggests that slow and fast motor neurons control distinct motor regimes. Indeed, we find that optogenetic manipulation of each motor neuron type has distinct effects on the behavior of walking flies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural and functional synaptic plasticity induced by convergent synapse loss requires co-innervation in the Drosophila neuromuscular circuit 96%
- Presynaptic Mitochondrial Volume and Density Scale with Presynaptic Power Demand 96%
- Cellular expression and functional roles of all 26 neurotransmitter GPCRs in the C. elegans egg-laying circuit 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.