Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria Share Common Principles to Coordinate Growth and the Cell Cycle at the Single-cell Level
Sauls, J. T.; Cox, S. E.; Doh, Q.; Castillo, V.; Ghulam-Jelani, Z.; Jun, S.
Show abstract
Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli are evolutionarily divergent model organisms that have elucidated fundamental differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Despite their differences in cell cycle control at the molecular level, both organisms follow the same phenomenological principle for cell size homeostasis known as the adder. We thus asked to what extent B. subtilis and E. coli share common physiological principles in coordinating growth and the cell cycle. To answer this question, we measured physiological parameters of B. subtilis under various steady-state growth conditions with and without translation inhibition at both population and single-cell level. These experiments revealed core shared physiological principles between B. subtilis and E. coli. Specifically, we show that both organisms maintain an invariant cell size per replication origin at initiation, with and without growth inhibition, and even during nutrient shifts at the single-cell level. Furthermore, both organisms also inherit the same \"hierarchy\" of physiological parameters ranked by their coefficient of variation. Based on these findings, we suggest that the basic coordination principles between growth and the cell cycle in bacteria may have been established in the very early stages of evolution.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell cycle dysregulation of globally important SAR11 bacteria resulting from environmental perturbation 98%
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis grows linearly at the single-cell level with larger variability than model organisms 97%
- Entropy-driven translocation of disordered proteins through the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.