Back

Integrin α6β4 is downregulated in mutant IDH1 oligodendrogliomas, promotes glioma growth, and associates with a worse outcome in glioma patients

Stewart, R.; Chen, M.; Mulkearns-Hubert, E.; Lathia, J.; O'Connor, K.; Horbinski, C.

2019-08-15 cancer biology
10.1101/726489 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The integrin 6{beta}4 is a laminin receptor that associates with aggressive behavior in many cancers, though its significance in gliomas has not been established. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDHmut) are common in gliomas, especially 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendrogliomas, and correlate with improved patient survival. We sought to determine whether there is a link between integrin {beta}4 and malignant behavior in gliomas. An inverse relationship was identified between IDHmut and integrin {beta}4 expression in a glioma TMA (P < 0.0001) and in TCGA grade II-IV gliomas (P < 0.0001). Methylation of CpG sites in the ITGB4 promoter is significantly higher in IDHmut gliomas when compared to wild-type tumors, and both ITGB4 methylation and reduced ITGB4 mRNA are not only most prominent in the 1p/19q co-deleted subset of IDHmut tumors, but fully account for the lower ITGB4 expression observed in IDHmut gliomas. In fact, ITGB4 is one of the most downregulated genes in IDHmut 1p/19q co-deleted gliomas compared to IDHmut 1p/19q intact gliomas (P = 3.2x10-39). In patient-derived glioma cells, we found that integrin {beta}4 is enriched in the stem-like population, and that knockdown of integrin {beta}4 slows glioma growth in vitro (P < 0.001) and in vivo (P = 0.01). Lower ITGB4 mRNA levels were also associated with longer overall survival in multiple patient cohorts (P = 0.0005; P < 0.0001). These data suggest that integrin {beta}4 increases glioma malignancy, and that its relative paucity may contribute to the better prognosis in IDH1/2 mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendrogliomas.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.