Back

Computational mapping of the differentially expressed gene-lncRNA pairs present at the root nodule developmental stages of Arachis hypogaea

Rizvi, A. Z.; Dhusia, K.

2019-08-05 bioinformatics
10.1101/724674 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data analysis of the different stages of root nodules formation in peanut Arachis hypogaea investigate the genetic features. Genes related to the root nodules formations in this plant are extensively studied [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], but less information is present for their relations with long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). Bioinformatics techniques are utilised here to identify the novel lncRNAs present in the publically available RNA-seq data reported [6] for the different stages of root nodules formation in this plant. Highly correlated, significant, and Differentially Expressed (DE) gene-lncRNA pairs are also detected to understand the epigenetic control of lncRNA. These pairs are further differentiated between cis and trans antisense lncRNAs and lincRNAs based on their functions and positions from the genes. Obtained results are the catalogue for the highly correlated and significant DE gene-lncRNA pairs related to root nodules formation in A. hypogaea.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
27.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Genes
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Genomics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
9
Plants
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
11
Gene
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
Biology
○ 45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Gene Reports
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Database
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
17
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.