Back

Effects of pathogenic CNVs on biochemical markers: a study on the UK Biobank

Bracher-Smith, M.; Kendall, K. M.; Rees, E.; Einon, M.; O'Donovan, M.; Owen, M. J.; Kirov, G.

2019-08-06 genomics
10.1101/723270 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) increase risk for medical disorders, even among carriers free from neurodevelopmental disorders. The UK Biobank recruited half a million adults who provided samples for biochemical and haematology tests which have recently been released. We wanted to assess how the presence of pathogenic CNVs affects these biochemical test results. MethodsWe called all CNVs from the Affymetrix microarrays and selected a set of 54 CNVs implicated as pathogenic (including their reciprocal deletions/duplications) and present in five or more persons. We used linear regression analysis to establish their association with 28 biochemical and 23 haematology tests. ResultsWe analysed 421k participants who passed our CNV quality control filters and self-reported as white British or Irish descent. There were 268 associations between CNVs and biomarkers that were significant at a false discovery rate of 0.05. Deletions at 16p11.2 had the highest number of significant associations, but several rare CNVs had higher effect sizes indicating that the lack of significance was likely due to the reduced statistical power for rarer events. The distribution of values can be visualised on our interactive website: http://kirov.psycm.cf.ac.uk/. ConclusionsCarriers of many pathogenic CNVs have changes in biochemical and haematology tests, and many of those are associated with adverse health consequences. These changes did not always correlate with increases in diagnosed medical disorders in this population. Carriers should have regular blood tests in order to identify and treat adverse medical consequences early. Levels of cholesterol and related lipids were unexpectedly lower in carriers of CNVs associated with increased weight gain, most likely due to the use of statins by such people.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
4
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
5
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
9
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
11
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
14
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%