Evolutionary constraints in regulatory networks defined by partial order between phenotypes
Kogenaru, M.; Nghe, P.; Poelwijk, F. J.; Tans, S. J.
Show abstract
Gene regulation networks allow organisms to adapt to diverse environmental niches. However, the constraints underlying the evolution of regulatory phenotypes remain ill-defined both theoretically and experimentally. Here, we show that the concept of partial order identifies such constraints, and test the predictions by experimentally evolving an engineered signal-integrating network in multiple environments. We find that populations: 1) expand in fitness space along the Pareto-optimal front predicted by conflicts in regulatory demands, by fine-tuning binding affinities within the network, 2) expand beyond this constraint by changes in the network structure, thus allowing access to new fitness domains. Strikingly, the constraint predictions are based on whether the network output increases or decreases in response to the different signals, and do not require information on the network architecture or underlying genetics. Overall, our findings show that limited knowledge on current regulatory phenotypes can provide predictions on future evolutionary constraints.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pleiotropic win-win mutations can rapidly evolve in a nascent cooperative community despite unfavorable conditions 94%
- Multi-step vs. single-step resistance evolution under different drugs, pharmacokinetics and treatment regimens 94%
- Host-parasite coevolution promotes innovation through deformations in fitness landscapes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reward expectations direct learning and drive operant matching in Drosophila 95%
- Multiplicity of Type 6 Secretion System toxins limits the evolution of resistance 95%
- Revealing 29 sets of independently modulated genes in Staphylococcus aureus, their regulators and role in key physiological responses 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.