Back

Extending site-based observations to predict the spatial patterns of vegetation structure and composition

McNellie, M. J.; Oliver, I.; Ferrier, S.; Newell, G.; Manion, G.; Griffioen, P.; White, M.; Koen, T.; Somerville, M.; Gibbons, P.

2019-07-26 ecology
10.1101/715797 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ContextConservation planning and land management are inherently spatial processes that are most effective when implemented over large areas.\n\nObjectivesOur objectives were to (i) use existing plot data to aggregate species inventories to growth forms and derive indicators of vegetation structure and composition and ii) generate spatially-explicit, continuous, landscape scaled models of these discrete vegetation indicators, accompanied by maps of model uncertainty.\n\nMethodUsing a case study from New South Wales, Australia, we aggregated floristic observations from 7234 sites into growth forms. We trained ensembles of artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict the distribution of these indicators over a broad region covering 11.5 million hectares. Importantly, we show spatially explicit models of uncertainty so that end-users have a tangible and transparent means of assessing models.\n\nResultsOur key findings were firstly, widely available site-based floristic records can be used to derive aggregated indicators of the structure and composition of plant growth forms. Secondly, ANNs are a powerful method to predict continuous patterns in complex, non-linear data (Pearsons correlation coefficient 0.83 (total native vegetation cover) to 0.42 (forb cover)). Thirdly, maps of the standardised residual error give insight into model performance and provide an assessment of model uncertainty in specific locations.\n\nConclusionsSpatially explicit, continuous representations of vegetation composition and structural complexity can add considerable value to conventional maps of vegetation extent or community type. This application has the potential to enhance the capacity for conservation planners, landscape managers and policy-makers to make informed decisions across landscape and regional scales.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.6%
2
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
3
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
5
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
12
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
13
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
14
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
15
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
17
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
18
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
19
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
21
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
22
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
23
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
25
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
27
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
28
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
29
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
30
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%