Extending site-based observations to predict the spatial patterns of vegetation structure and composition
McNellie, M. J.; Oliver, I.; Ferrier, S.; Newell, G.; Manion, G.; Griffioen, P.; White, M.; Koen, T.; Somerville, M.; Gibbons, P.
Show abstract
ContextConservation planning and land management are inherently spatial processes that are most effective when implemented over large areas.\n\nObjectivesOur objectives were to (i) use existing plot data to aggregate species inventories to growth forms and derive indicators of vegetation structure and composition and ii) generate spatially-explicit, continuous, landscape scaled models of these discrete vegetation indicators, accompanied by maps of model uncertainty.\n\nMethodUsing a case study from New South Wales, Australia, we aggregated floristic observations from 7234 sites into growth forms. We trained ensembles of artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict the distribution of these indicators over a broad region covering 11.5 million hectares. Importantly, we show spatially explicit models of uncertainty so that end-users have a tangible and transparent means of assessing models.\n\nResultsOur key findings were firstly, widely available site-based floristic records can be used to derive aggregated indicators of the structure and composition of plant growth forms. Secondly, ANNs are a powerful method to predict continuous patterns in complex, non-linear data (Pearsons correlation coefficient 0.83 (total native vegetation cover) to 0.42 (forb cover)). Thirdly, maps of the standardised residual error give insight into model performance and provide an assessment of model uncertainty in specific locations.\n\nConclusionsSpatially explicit, continuous representations of vegetation composition and structural complexity can add considerable value to conventional maps of vegetation extent or community type. This application has the potential to enhance the capacity for conservation planners, landscape managers and policy-makers to make informed decisions across landscape and regional scales.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Landsat predictions of rangeland fractional cover with multitask learning and uncertainty 96%
- Disentangling effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services - a multi-scale experimental design 95%
- Estimating the cumulative impact and zone of influence of anthropogenic features on biodiversity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projecting spatiotemporal bioclimatic niche dynamics of endemic Pyrenean plant species under climate change: how much will we lose? 94%
- : A tool for modelling ecosystem resilience 94%
- Bayesian species distribution models integrate presence-only and presence-absence data to predict deer distribution and relative abundance. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.