Back

Metabolic Profiling of Aortic Stenosis and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Identifies Mechanistic Contrasts in Substrate Utilisation

Pal, N.; Acharjee, A.; Ament, Z.; Dent, T.; Yavari, A.; Mahmod, M.; Ariga, R.; West, J.; Steeples, V.; Cassar, M.; Howell, N. J.; Lockstone, H.; Elliott, K.; Yavari, P.; Nguyen, T. H.; Briggs, W.; Hare, D. L.; French, J.; Unger, S.; Richards, M.; Keech, A.; Horowitz, J. D.; Frenneaux, M.; Prendergast, B.; Dwight, J. S.; Kharbanda, R.; Watkins, H.; Ashrafian, H.; Griffin, J.

2019-08-07 systems biology
10.1101/715680 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAortic stenosis (AS) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are highly distinct disorders leading to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), but whether cardiac metabolism substantially differs between these in humans remains to be elucidated.\n\nMethodWe undertook a detailed invasive (aortic root and coronary sinus) metabolic profiling in patients with severe AS and HCM in comparison to non-LVH controls, to investigate cardiac fuel selection and metabolic remodelling. These patients were assessed under different physiological states (at rest and during stress induced by pacing). The identified changes in the metabolome were further validated by metabolomic and orthogonal transcriptomic analysis, in separately recruited patient cohorts.\n\nResultsWe identified a highly discriminant metabolomic signature in severe AS characterised by striking accumulation of long-chain acylcarnitines, intermediates of long-chain transport and fatty acid metabolism, and validated this in a separate cohort. Mechanistically, we identify a down-regulation in the PPAR- transcriptional network, including expression of genes regulating FAO.\n\nConclusionsWe present a comprehensive analysis of changes in the metabolic pathways (transcriptome to metabolome) in severe AS, and its comparison to HCM. Our results demonstrate fundamental distinctions in substrate preference between AS and HCM, highlighting insufficient long-chain FAO, and the PPAR- signalling network as a specific metabolic therapeutic target in AS.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.7%
2
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
4
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
5
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
8
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.0%
15
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
26
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%