Back

Multi-ancestry GWAS of the electrocardiographic PR interval identifies 210 loci underlying cardiac conduction

Ntalla, I.; Weng, L.-C.; Cartwright, J. H.; Hall, A.; Sveinbjornsson, G.; Tucker, N. R.; Seung Young, C.; Chaffin, M. D.; Roselli, C.; Barnes, M. R.; Mifsud, B.; Warren, H. R.; Hayward, C.; Marten, J.; Cranley, J. J.; Concas, M. P.; Gasparini, P.; Boutin, T.; Kolcic, I.; Polasek, O.; Rudan, I.; Araujo, N. M.; Lima-Costa, M. F.; Ribeiro, A. L. P.; Souza, R. P.; Tarazona-Santos, E.; Giedraitis, V.; Ingelsson, E.; Mahajan, A.; Morris, A. P.; Del Greco M., F.; Foco, L.; Gogele, M.; Hicks, A. A.; Cook, J. P.; Lind, L.; Lindgren, C. M.; Sundstrom, J.; Nelson, C. P.; Riaz, M. B.; Samani, N. J.; Sinag

2019-07-24 genetics
10.1101/712398 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The electrocardiographic PR interval reflects atrioventricular conduction, and is associated with conduction abnormalities, pacemaker implantation, atrial fibrillation (AF), and cardiovascular mortality1,2. We performed multi-ancestry (N=293,051) and European only (N=271,570) genome-wide association (GWAS) meta-analyses for the PR interval, discovering 210 loci of which 149 are novel. Variants at all loci nearly doubled the percentage of heritability explained, from 33.5% to 62.6%. We observed enrichment for genes involved in cardiac muscle development/contraction and the cytoskeleton highlighting key regulation processes for atrioventricular conduction. Additionally, 19 novel loci harbour genes underlying inherited monogenic heart diseases suggesting the role of these genes in cardiovascular pathology in the general population. We showed that polygenic predisposition to PR interval duration is an endophenotype for cardiovascular disease risk, including distal conduction disease, AF, atrioventricular pre-excitation, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and coronary heart disease. These findings advance our understanding of the polygenic basis of cardiac conduction, and the genetic relationship between PR interval duration and cardiovascular disease.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.