Lessons in genome engineering: opportunities, tools and pitfalls
Poernbacher, I.; Crossman, S.; Kurth, J.; Nojima, H.; Baena-Lopez, A.; Alexandre, C.; vincent, J.-P.
Show abstract
CRISPR/Cas technology allows the creation of double strand breaks and hence loss of function mutations at any location in the genome. This technology is now routine for many organisms and cell lines. Here we describe how CRISPR/Cas can be combined with other DNA manipulation techniques (e.g. homology-based repair, site-specific integration and Cre or FLP-mediated recombination) to create sophisticated tools to measure and manipulate gene activity. In one class of applications, a single site-specific insertion generates a transcriptional reporter, a loss-of function allele, and a tagged allele. In a second class of modifications, essential sequences are deleted and replaced with an integrase site, which serves as a platform for the creation of custom reporters, transcriptional drivers, conditional alleles and regulatory mutations. We describe how these tools and protocols can be implemented easily and efficiently. Importantly, we also highlight unanticipated failures, which serve as cautionary tales, and suggest mitigating measures. Our tools are designed for use in Drosophila but the lessons we draw are likely to be widely relevant.\n\nAUTHOR SUMMARYThe genome contains all the information that an organism needs to develop and function throughout its life. One of the goal of genetics is to decipher the role of all the genes (typically several thousands for an animal) present in the genome. One approach is to delete each gene and assay the consequences. Deletion of individual genes is now readily achieved with a technique called CRISPR/Cas9. However, simple genetic deletion provides limited information. Here we describe strains and DNA vectors that streamline the generation of more sophisticated genetic tools. We describe general means of creating alleles (genetic variants) that enable gene activity to be measured and experimentally modulated in space and time. Although the tools we describe are universally applicable, each gene requires special consideration. Based on our experience of successes and failures, we suggest measures to maximise the chances that engineered alleles serve their intended purpose. Although our methods are designed for use in Drosophila, they could be adapted to any organism that is amenable to CRISPR/Cas9 genome modification.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- phiC31 integrase for recombination mediated single copy insertion and genome manipulation in C. elegans 95%
- Expanding the Caenorhabditis elegans auxin-inducible degron system toolkit with internal expression and degradation controls and improved modular constructs for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing 94%
- Genome-wide screen for deficiencies modifying Cyclin G-induced developmental instability in Drosophila melanogaster. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The haplolethality paradox of the wupA gene in Drosophila 96%
- A Genetic Screen for Suppressors of Cryptic 5' Splicing in C. elegans Reveals Roles for KIN17 and PRCC in Maintaining Both 5' and 3' Splice Site Identity 94%
- Filamin protects myofibrils from contractile damage through changes in its mechanosensory region 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inducible degradation of the Drosophila Mediator subunit Med19 reveals its role in regulating developmental but not constitutively-expressed genes 94%
- Role of centromere sites in activation of ParB proteins for partition complex assembly 94%
- Exploring the evolution and function of Canoes intrinsically disordered region in linking cell-cell junctions to the cytoskeleton during embryonic morphogenesis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.