Back

Short-term oxaliplatin exposure according to established hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) protocols lacks effectiveness in vitro and ex vivo

Löffler, M. W.; Seyfried, N.; Burkard, M.; Oswald, B.; Tolios, A.; Yurttas, C.; Herster, F.; Kauer, J.; Jäger, T.; Thiel, K.; Haen, S. P.; Rammensee, H.-G.; Venturelli, S.; Schwab, M.; Königsrainer, A.; Beckert, S.

2019-07-31 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/709055 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin-containing solutions (OCS), sampled during patient treatment with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), was assessed by well-established continuous impedance-based real-time cell analysis (RTCA) ex vivo. HIPEC treatment was replicated by exposing OAW-42 cancer cells to OCS for 30 or 60 minutes at 42 {degrees}C. In contrast to previous observations with continuous exposure, where cytotoxicity was proven, identical OCS obtained during HIPEC did not induce cell death reproducibly and showed strongly attenuated effects after only 30 minutes of application. Based on these unexpected findings, spike-ins of oxaliplatin (OX) into peritoneal dialysis solution (PDS) or dextrose 5 % in water (D5W) were used to replicate HIPEC conditions, as used in either our own protocols or the recently presented randomized controlled PRODIGE 7 trial, where OX HIPEC for 30 minutes failed to produce survival benefits in colorectal carcinoma patients. With OX-spiked into D5W or PDS at identical concentrations as used for PRODIGE 7 or conforming with own HIPEC protocols, we did not observe the expectable cytotoxic effects in RTCA, after replicating OX HIPEC for 30 minutes. These results were corroborated for both solvents at relevant drug concentrations by classical end-point assays for cytotoxicity in two cancer cell lines. Further results suggest that penetration depth, drug dosage, exposure time and drug solvents may constitute critical factors for HIPEC effectiveness. Accordingly, we witnessed substantial cell shrinkage with both PDS and D5W, potentially contributing to reduced drug effects. Based on these results, intensified pharmacological research seems warranted to establish effective HIPEC protocols.\n\nKey PointsO_LIOxaliplatin (OX)-containing solutions obtained during patient treatment with Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) unexpectedly showed low cytotoxicity in an impedance-based ex vivo cytotoxicity cell assay.\nC_LIO_LIOX cytotoxicity under HIPEC conditions could be enhanced by extending drug exposure to one hour by an impedance-based ex vivo cytotoxicity cell assay.\nC_LIO_LIHIPEC failed to show survival benefits in the randomized controlled PRODIGE 7 trial and was questioned in the aftermath.\nC_LIO_LIClinically relevant OX concentrations applied in conjunction with hyperthermia (42 {degrees}C) for 30 minutes, as used either at our own medical center or according to the PRODIGE 7 trial, proved predominantly ineffective, when used according to HIPEC routines in an impedance-based in vitro cytotoxicity cell assay.\nC_LIO_LIRespective findings were corroborated in two different cell lines and by two established end-point assays, showing that 50 % cell death could not be reached by the same HIPEC treatment with OX, in contrast to continuous drug exposure.\nC_LIO_LIAs potentially relevant factor, the thickness of the exposed cell layer was identified, requiring at least ~100 {micro}m penetration depth for our model to indicate effectiveness.\nC_LIO_LIAdditionally, we show relevant cell shrinkage by two drug diluents used either at our own medical center or according to the PRODIGE 7 trial, potentially associated with fluid shifts out of the cell and impaired drug effects.\nC_LIO_LIOur own as well as recent findings by Ubink et al. (Br J Surg. 2019. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11206) support the notion that lacking effectiveness of OX HIPEC may explain the negative PRODIGE 7 trial results.\nC_LI

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.