Back

Plasma-derived HIV Nef+ exosomes persist in ACTG384 study participants despite successful virological suppression.

Raymond, A. D.; Lang, M. J.; Chu, J.; Campbell-Sims, T.; Khan, M. B.; Bond, V. C.; Pollard, R. B.; Asmuth, D. M.; Powell, M. D.

2019-07-20 microbiology
10.1101/708719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) accessory protein Negative factor (Nef) is detected in the plasma of HIV+ individuals associated with exosomes. The role of Nef+ exosomes (exNef) in HIV pathogenesis is unknown. We perform a retrospective longitudinal analysis to determine correlative clinical associations of exNef plasma levels in ARV-treated HIV+ patients with or without immune recovery. exNef concentration in a subset of AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) 384 participants with successful virological suppression and with either high ({Delta} >100 CD4 cell recovery/High Immunological Responders (High-IR) or low ({Delta} [≤]100 CD4 cell recovery/ Low Immunologic Responders (Low-IR) immunologic recovery was measured and compared for study weeks 48, 96, and 144. CD4 recovery showed a negative correlation with exNef at study week 144 (r = -0.3573, *p=.0366). Plasma exNef concentration in high IRs negatively correlated with naive CD4 count and recovery (r = -0.3249, *p = 0. 0348 (High-IR); r =0.2981, *p= #0.0513 (Low-IR)). However, recovery of CD4 memory cells positively correlated with exNef (r =.4534, *p=.0358) in Low-IRs but not in High-IRs. Regimen A (Didanosine, Stavudine, Efavirenz) lowered exNef levels in IRs by 2-fold compared to other regimens. Nef+ exosomes persist in ART-treated HIV+ individuals despite undetectable viral loads, negatively correlates with naive and memory CD4 T cell restoration and may be associated with reduced immunological recovery. Taken together, these data suggest that exNef may represent a novel mechanism utilized by HIV to promote immune dysregulation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.