HD-tDCS over mIPS causally modulates online reach correction
Goettker, A.; Caie, B.; Jeyachandra, J.; Xu, S.; Gallivan, J.; Dmochowski, J.; Fiehler, K.; Blohm, G.
Show abstract
Brain lesion and stimulation studies have suggested posterior parietal cortex and the medial intraparietal sulcus in particular as a crucial hub for online movement error corrections. However, causal evidence for this is still sparse. Indeed, lesion studies are potentially confounded by compensatory reorganization mechanisms while brain stimulation studies have produced heterogeneous results when employing transcranial magnetic stimulation. Here we designed a new complementary paradigm using fMRI-guided high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of the left medial intraparietal sulcus (mIPS) together with regression-based mediation analysis to re-examine the causal role of mIPS in online reach corrections to jumping targets. We obtained two independent measures of stimulation-induced changes in brain activity by modeling current flow in the brain and through EEG recordings before and after HD-tDCS stimulation. Third, to quantify behavioral effects of HD-tDCS we computed movement curvature as a measure of online correction. We demonstrate that both of our measurements of brain activity were consistent with a polarity-specific modulation of the online correction for targets jumping to the contralateral side of the stimulation. Importantly, using a mediation analysis of the relationship between stimulation current and movement curvature suggests that the induced current modifies brain activity, which then leads to the observed behavioral changes. This unique combination of methods and analysis thus provides complementary evidence for the crucial role of the posterior parietal cortex in online error correction, while at the same time setting a new methodological standard with respect to the causal influence of transcranial direct current stimulation. New & NoteworthyTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an interesting and potentially useful tool for asking causal scientific questions and design clinical treatments. With our unique combination of highly accurate fMRI guided stimulation, current forward modeling, EEG recordings before and after the stimulation and behavioral changes we could unravel the causal structure of tDCS. Our approach naturally deals with the variability of tDCS results, increasing its potential usefulness as a tool for research and clinical applications.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The phase of tACS-entrained pre-SMA beta oscillations modulates motor inhibition 97%
- Mental individuation of imagined finger movements can be achieved using TMS-based neurofeedback 97%
- Temporally-precise disruption of prefrontal cortex informed by the timing of beta bursts impairs human action-stopping 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of threshold-level stimuli modulated by temporal predictions of the cerebellum 97%
- Brain encoding of naturalistic, continuous, and unpredictable tactile events 96%
- Transcranial Static Magnetic Stimulation Dissociates the Causal Roles of the Parietal Cortex in Spatial and Temporal Processing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability 97%
- Personalized whole-brain activity patterns predict human corticospinal tract activation in real-time 96%
- Does pericentral mu-rhythm power corticomotor excitability? A matter of EEG perspective 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial focused ultrasound to rIFG improves response inhibition through modulation of the P300 onset latency 96%
- Attention network modulation via tRNS correlates with attention gain 96%
- Neural excitability and sensory input determine intensity perception with opposing directions in initial cortical responses 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.