Back

Coevolution between life-history and metabolic rate depends on ontogenetic stage

Sowersby, W.; Morozov, S.; Eckerstrom-Liedholm, S.; Lehmann, P.; Rowinski, P.; Naslund, J.; Gonzalez-Voyer, A.; Rogell, B.

2019-07-18 evolutionary biology
10.1101/705707 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metabolic rate is considered to determine the energetic investment placed into life-history traits, regulating the speed of an organisms life-cycle and forming the so called \"pace-of-life\". However, how metabolic rate and life-history traits co-evolve remains unclear. For instance, the energetic demands of life-history traits, including the number of energy allocation trade-offs, is unlikely to remain constant over ontogeny. Therefore, the predicted coevolution between metabolic rate and life-history could be specific to particular ontogenetic stages, rather than a stable property of an organism. Here, we test the ontogenetic dependency of the coevolution between metabolic rate and the pace of life-history, under strictly standardized conditions using 30 species of killifish, which are either annual species adapted to ephemeral pools or non-annual species inhabiting more permanent waterbodies. Standard metabolic rates were estimated at three ontogenetic stages, together with relevant life-history traits, i.e. growth (juveniles), maturity (young adults), and reproductive rate (reproductive adults). Life-history traits largely followed predicted pace-of-life patterns, with overall faster/higher rates in annual species. The divergences in life-history traits across species tended to increase over ontogeny, being smallest during juvenile growth and largest in reproductive adults. However, associations between life-history strategy and metabolic rate followed a reversed pattern, being strongest in juveniles, but lowest in reproductive adults. Our results are concordant with the number of energetic trade-offs increasing over ontogeny, which results in a stronger covariation between physiology and life-history traits earlier in ontogeny.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.0%
2
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
3
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.5%
5
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
17
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
19
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
23
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%