A computational knowledge engine for human neuroscience
Beam, E.; Potts, C.; Poldrack, R. A.; Etkin, A.
Show abstract
Functional neuroimaging has been a mainstay of human neuroscience for the past 25 years. The goal for this research has largely been to understand how activity across brain structures relates to mental constructs and computations. However, interpretation of fMRI data has often occurred within knowledge frameworks crafted by experts, which have the potential to reify historical trends and amplify the subjective biases that limit the replicability of findings. 1 In other words, we lack a comprehensive data-driven ontology for structure-function mapping in the human brain, through which we can also test the explanatory value of current dominant conceptual frameworks. Ontologies in other fields are popular tools for automated data synthesis,2, 3 yet relatively few attempts have been made to engineer ontologies in a data-driven manner.4 Here, we employ a computational approach to derive a data-driven ontology for neurobiological domains that synthesizes the texts and data of nearly 20,000 human neuroimaging articles. The data-driven ontology includes 6 domains, each defined by a circuit of brain structures and its associated mental functions. Several of these domains are omitted from the leading framework in neuroscience, while others uncover novel combinations of mental functions related to common brain circuitry. Crucially, the structure-function links in each domain better replicate across articles in held-out data than those mapped from the dominant frameworks in neuroscience and psychiatry. We further show that the data-driven ontology partitions the literature into modular subfields, for which the domains serve as generalizable archetypes of the structure-function patterns observed in single articles. The approach to computational ontology we present here is the most comprehensive functional characterization of human brain circuits quantifiable with fMRI. Moreover, our methods can be extended to synthesize other scientific literatures, yielding ontologies that are built up from the data of the field.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Concepts in the Brain by Mapping Cortical Representations of Semantic Relations 95%
- Genetic correlates of evolutionary adaptations in cognitive functional brain networks and their relationship to human cognitive functioning and disease 95%
- Cellular and molecular associations with intrinsic brain organization 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subspace partitioning in human prefrontal cortex resolves cognitive interference 93%
- Conserved whole-brain spatiomolecular gradients shape adult brain functional organization 92%
- Electrophysiological measures from human iPSC-derived neurons are associated with schizophrenia clinical status and predict individual cognitive performance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.