Artifact Formation in Single Molecule Localization Microscopy
Reichel, J. M.; Vomhof, T.; Michaelis, J.
Show abstract
We investigate the influence of different accuracy-detection rate trade-offs on image reconstruction in single molecule localization microscopy. Our main focus is the investigation of image artifacts experienced when using low localization accuracy, especially in the presence of sample drift and inhomogeneous background. In this context we present a newly developed SMLM software termed FIRESTORM which is optimized for high accuracy reconstruction. For our analysis we used in silico SMLM data and compared the reconstructed images to the ground truth data. We observe two discriminable reconstruction populations of which only one shows the desired localization behavior.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- VIPR: Vectorial Implementation of Phase Retrieval for fast and accurate microscopic pixel-wise pupil estimation 96%
- Learned SPARCOM: Unfolded Deep Super-Resolution Microscopy 96%
- Divide and Conquer: Real-time maximum likelihood fitting of multiple emitters for super-resolution localization microscopy 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- An evaluation of multi-excitation-wavelength standing-wave fluorescence microscopy (TartanSW) to improve sampling density in studies of the cell membrane and cytoskeleton 94%
- The optics of the human eye at 8.6 µm lateral resolution 93%
- Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy with Scanning Non-diffracting Beams 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- One-Shot phase-recovery using a Cellphone RGB Camera on a Jamin-Lebedeff Microscope 96%
- Advances on sparse Dynamic Scanning in Spectromicroscopy through Compressive Sensing 95%
- Probabilistic Optically-Selective Single-molecule Imaging Based Localization Encoded (POSSIBLE) Microscopy for Ultra-superresolution Imaging of Dendra2-HA transfected NIH3T3 cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.