Back

Juxta-membrane S-acylation of plant receptor-like kinases - fortuitous or functional?

Hurst, C. H.; Wright, K. M.; Turnbull, D.; Leslie, K.; Jones, S.; Hemsley, P. A.

2019-07-05 plant biology
10.1101/693887 bioRxiv
Show abstract

S-acylation is a common post-translational modification of membrane protein cysteine residues with many regulatory roles. S-acylation adjacent to transmembrane domains has been described in the literature as affecting diverse protein properties including turnover, trafficking and microdomain partitioning. However, all of these data are derived from mammalian and yeast systems. Here we examine the role of S-acylation adjacent to the transmembrane domain of the plant pathogen perceiving receptor-like kinase FLS2. Surprisingly, S-acylation of FLS2 adjacent to the transmembrane domain is not required for either FLS2 trafficking or signalling function. Expanding this analysis to the wider plant receptor-like kinase superfamily we find that S-acylation adjacent to receptor-like kinase domains is common but poorly conserved between orthologues through evolution. This suggests that S-acylation of receptor-like kinases at this site is likely the result of chance mutation leading to cysteine occurrence. As transmembrane domains followed by cysteine residues are common motifs for S-acylation to occur, and many S-acyl transferases appear to have lax substrate specificity, we propose that many receptor-like kinases are fortuitously S-acylated once chance mutation has introduced a cysteine at this site. Interestingly some receptor-like kinases show conservation of S-acylation sites between orthologues suggesting that S-acylation has come to play a role and has been positively selected for during evolution. The most notable example of this is in the ERECTA-like family where S-acylation of ERECTA adjacent to the transmembrane domain occurs in all ERECTA orthologues but not in the parental ERECTA-like clade. This suggests that ERECTA S-acylation occurred when ERECTA emerged during the evolution of angiosperms and may have contributed to the neo-functionalisation of ERECTA from ERECTA-like proteins.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
6
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
12
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
13
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
28
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%