Reduction in voluntary activation of elbow and wrist muscles in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke
Garmirian, L. R. P.; Dewald, J. P. A.; Acosta, A. M.
Show abstract
After a stroke, descending drive is impaired due to the loss of corticospinal and corticobulbar projections which causes a reduction in voluntary activation or an inability of the nervous system to activate muscles to their full capacity, which in turn contributes to weakness of the upper extremity. Voluntary activation has not been quantified at specific joints in the upper extremity, in part because directly assessing changes descending drive is difficult. In this study, voluntary activation of elbow and wrist flexors and extensors was assessed in participants with chronic hemiparetic stroke using twitch interpolation. Twitch interpolation uses electrical stimulation to estimate voluntary activation and relies on the principle that there is an inverse relationship between the amplitude of a twitch evoked by a stimulus and the voluntary force output during stimulation (Taylor, 2009). We measured voluntary activation using twitch interpolation as well as maximum voluntary torque (MVT) of the elbow and wrist flexors and extensors in the paretic and non-paretic limb of ten participants post stroke and the dominant and non-dominant limb of 2 control participants. Results show, MVT interlimb differences were significantly greater for stroke participants compared to control, across muscle groups (p[≤]0.005). For stroke participants, MVT interlimb differences were significantly greater at the wrist compared to the elbow (P=0.003). Voluntary activation was significantly less in the paretic limb compared to the non-paretic, dominant and non-dominant limbs, across participants and muscle groups (p<0.005 for all four muscle groups). For the stroke participants, the voluntary activation interlimb difference was significantly greater for the wrist muscles compared to the elbow muscles (p<0.005). There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.39, P = .022) between each participants impairment level, as measured by a hand specific subscore of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and the wrist extensor voluntary activation in the paretic limb but the relationship was not significant for the other muscle groups.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial mapping of posture-dependent resistance to passive displacement of the hypertonic arm post-stroke 95%
- Technology-aided assessment of functionally relevant sensorimotor impairments in arm and hand of post-stroke individuals 95%
- Use of the non-paretic arm reflects a habitual behaviour in chronic stroke 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of An Inverted Seated Position with Upper Arm Blood Flow Restriction on Measures of Elbow Flexors Neuromuscular Performance 95%
- Characteristics of motor evoked potentials in patients with peripheral vascular disease. 95%
- Effects of bilateral and unilateral mental practice on actual motor performance and event-related desynchronization 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Abnormal synergies and associated reactions post-hemiparetic stroke reflect the neuroanatomy of brainstem motor pathways 97%
- Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability and Muscle Synergies During Complex Locomotor Task in Individuals With and Without Cerebral Palsy: A TMS and EMG Study 95%
- Sensorimotor upper limb therapy does not improve somatosensory function and may negatively interfere with motor recovery: a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- How Well Do Commonly Used Co-Contraction Indices Approximate Lower Limb Joint Stiffness Trends during Gait? 94%
- Analysis of the effectiveness of sub-sensory electrical noise stimulation during visuomotor adaptations in different visual feedback conditions 93%
- Changes in Walking Function and Neural Control following Pelvic Cancer Surgery with Reconstruction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.