Back

The dark side of amyloid aggregation: Exploring the productive and non-productive pathways with multi-scale modeling

Jia, Z.; Schmit, J.; Chen, J.

2019-06-28 biophysics
10.1101/687020 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Atomistic description of protein fibril formation has remained prohibitive due to the complexity and long timescales of the conformational search problem. Here, we develop a multi-scale approach that combines a large number of atomistic molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent to derive Markov State Models (MSMs) for simulation of fibril growth. The search for the in-registered fully bound fibril state is modeled as a random walk on a rugged 2D energy landscape along enumerated {beta}-sheet registry and hydrogen bonding states, whereas interconversions among nonspecific bound states and between nonspecific and hydrogen-bounded states are derived from kinetic clustering analysis. The reversible association/dissociation of an incoming peptide and overall growth kinetics are then computed from MSM trajectories. This approach is applied to derive a comprehensive description of fibril elongation of wild-type A{beta}16-22 and how it is modulated by phenylalanine to cyclohexane (CHA) mutations. The resulting models recapitulate the experimental observation that mutants CHA19 and CHA1920 accelerate fibril elongation, but have a relatively minor effect on the critical concentration for fibril growth. Importantly, the kinetic consequences of mutations arise from a complex perturbation of the network of productive and non-productive pathways of fibril grown. This is consistent with the expectation that non-functional states will not have evolved efficient folding pathways and, therefore, will require a random search of configuration space. This study highlights the importance of describing the complete energy landscape when studying the elongation mechanism and kinetics of protein fibrils.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.