Optimal foraging of benthic diatoms evolving novel movement behaviours
Hu, W.-S.; Huang, M.-J.; Zhang, H.-P.; Zhang, F.; Vyverman, W.; Liu, Q.-X.
Show abstract
Adaptive locomotion of living organisms contributes to their competitive abilities and helps maintain their fitness in diverse environments. To date, however, our understanding of searching behavior and its ultimate cause remains poorly understood in ecology and biology. Here, we investigate motion patterns of biofilm-inhabiting marine raphid diatom Navicula arenaria var. rostellata in two-dimensional space. We report that individual Navicula cells display a "circular run-and-reversal" movement behavior at different concentrations of dissolved silicic acid (dSi). We show that gliding motions of cells can be predicted accurately with a universal Langevin model. Our experimental results are consistent with an optimal foraging strategy and a maximized diffusivity of the theoretical outcomes in which both circular-run and reversal behaviors are important ingredients. Our theoretical results suggest that the evolving movement behaviors of diatoms may be driven by optimization of searching behavioral strategy, and predicted behavioral parameters coincide with the experimental observations. These optimized movement behaviors are an evolutionarily stable strategy to cope with environmental complexity. ONE SENTENCE SUMMARYNovel experiments and modelling reveal that raphid diatoms can actively exploit resources in complex environments by adjusting their movement behavior.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergence of alternative stable states in microbial communities undergoing horizontal gene transfer 96%
- Cellular coordination underpins rapid reversals in gliding filamentous cyanobacteria and its loss results in plectonemes 96%
- Emergent periodicity in the collective synchronous flashing of fireflies 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.