Multi-session visual cortex transcranial random noise stimulation in adults with amblyopia
Donkor, R.; Silva, A. E.; Teske, C.; Wallis-Duffy, M.; Thompson, B.
Show abstract
PurposeWe tested the hypothesis that five daily sessions of visual cortex transcranial random noise stimulation would improve contrast sensitivity, crowded and uncrowded visual acuity in adults with amblyopia. MethodsNineteen adults with amblyopia (44.2 {+/-} 14.9yrs, 10 female) were randomly allocated to active or sham tRNS of the visual cortex (active, n = 9; sham, n = 10). tRNS was delivered for 25 minutes across five consecutive days. Monocular contrast sensitivity, uncrowded and crowded visual acuity were measured before, during, 5 minutes and 30 minutes post stimulation on each day. ResultsActive tRNS significantly improved contrast sensitivity and uncrowded visual acuity for both amblyopic and fellow eyes whereas sham stimulation had no effect. An analysis of the day by day effects revealed large within session improvements on day 1 for the active group that waned across subsequent days. No long-lasting (multi-day) improvements were observed for contrast sensitivity, however a long-lasting improvement in amblyopic eye uncrowded visual acuity was observed for the active group. This improvement remained at 28 day follow up. However, between-group differences in baseline uncrowded visual acuity complicate the interpretation of this effect. No effect of tRNS was observed for amblyopic eye crowded visual acuity. ConclusionsIn agreement with previous non-invasive brain stimulation studies using different techniques, tRNS induced short-term contrast sensitivity improvements in adult amblyopic eyes, however, multiple sessions of tRNS did not lead to enhanced or long-lasting effects for the majority of outcome measures.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Torsion-Induced Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TITON): A Physiologically Relevant Animal Model of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy 93%
- What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users 92%
- Reading; through the eyes of a university student: A double-masked randomised placebo-controlled cross-over protocol investigating coloured spectacle lens efficacy in adults with visual stress 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 92%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 92%
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduction of collinear inhibition in observers with central vision loss using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation: A case series. 97%
- Tonic and phasic transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation both evoke rapid and transient pupil dilation 92%
- The role of the parietal lobe in task-irrelevant suppression during learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A neural correlate of visual discomfort from flicker 91%
- Occipital Alpha-TMS causally modulates Temporal Order Judgements: Evidence for discrete temporal windows in vision 90%
- Assessment of binocular fixational eye movements including cyclotorsion with split-field binocular scanning laser ophthalmoscopy 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.