Distinguishing coalescent models - which statistics matter most?
Freund, F.; Siri-Jegousse, A.
Show abstract
Modelling genetic diversity needs an underlying genealogy model. To choose a fitting model based on genetic data, one can perform model selection between classes of genealogical trees, e.g. Kingmans coalescent with exponential growth or multiple merger coalescents. Such selection can be based on many different statistics measuring genetic diversity. A random forest based Approximate Bayesian Computation is used to disentangle the effects of different statistics on distinguishing between various classes of genealogy models. For the specific question of inferring whether genealogies feature multiple mergers, a new statistic, the minimal observable clade size, is introduced. When combined with classical site frequency based statistics, it reduces classification errors considerably.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Inference of multiple mergers while dating a pathogen phylogeny 96%
- ConvexML: Fast and accurate branch length estimation under irreversible mutation models, illustrated through applications to CRISPR/Cas9-based lineage tracing 96%
- A minimal yet flexible likelihood framework to assess correlated evolution 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.