Back

Enhancer-dependence of gene expression increases with developmental age

Cai, W.; Huang, J.; Zhu, Q.; Li, B. E.; Seruggia, D.; Zhou, P.; Nguyen, M.; Fujiwara, Y.; Xie, H.; Yang, Z.; Hong, D.; Ren, P.; Xu, J.; Pu, W. T.; Yuan, G.; Orkin, S. H.

2019-06-21 molecular biology
10.1101/678334 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How overall principles of gene regulation (the \"logic\") may change during ontogeny is largely unexplored. We compared transcriptomic, epigenomic and topological profiles in embryonic (EryP) and adult (EryD) erythroblasts. Despite reduced chromatin accessibility compared to EryP, distal chromatin of EryD is enriched in H3K27ac, Gata1 and Myb occupancy. In contrast to EryP-specific genes, which exhibit promoter-centric regulation through Gata1, EryD-specific genes employ distal enhancers for long-range regulation through enhancer-promoter looping, confirmed by Gata1 HiChIP. Genome editing demonstrated distal enhancers are required for gene expression in EryD but not in EryP. Applying a metric for enhancer-dependence of transcription, we observed a progressive reliance on enhancer control with increasing age of ontogeny among diverse primary cells and tissues of mouse and human origin. Our findings highlight fundamental and conserved differences in regulatory logic at distinct developmental stages, characterized by simpler promoter-centric regulation in embryonic cells and combinatorial enhancer-driven control in adult cells.\n\nHighlightsO_LIRegulation of embryonic-specific erythroid genes is promoter-centric through Gata1\nC_LIO_LIAdult-specific control is combinatorial enhancer-driven and requires Myb\nC_LIO_LIAdult specific genes have increased enhancer-promoter chromatin interactions\nC_LIO_LIEnhancer-dependence increases progressively with increasing developmental age\nC_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.