Back

Intramolecular Communication and Allosteric Sites in Enzymes Unraveled by Time-Dependent Linear Response Theory

Huang, B.-C.; Chang-Chein, C.-H.; Yang, L.-W.

2019-06-21 biophysics
10.1101/677617 bioRxiv
Show abstract

It has been an established idea in recent years that protein is a physiochemically connected network. Allostery, understood in this new context, is a manifestation of residue communicating between remote sites in this network, and hence a rising interest to identify functionally relevant communication pathways and the frequent communicators within. However, there have been limited computationally trackable general methods to discover proteins allosteric sites in atomistic resolution with good accuracy. In this study, we devised a time-dependent linear response theory (td-LRT) integrating intrinsic protein dynamics and perturbation forces that excite proteins temporary reconfiguration at the non-equilibrium state, to describe atom-specific time responses as the propagating mechanical signals and discover that the most frequent remote communicators can be important allosteric sites, mutation of which could deteriorate the hydride transfer rate in DHFR by 3 orders. The preferred directionality of the signal propagation can be inferred from the asymmetric connection matrix (CM), where the coupling strength between a pair of residues is suggested by their communication score (CS) in the CM, which is found consistent with experimentally characterized nonadditivity of double mutants. Also, the intramolecular communication centers (ICCs), having high CSs, are found evolutionarily conserved, suggesting their biological importance. We also identify spatially clustered top ICCs as the newly found allosteric site in ATG4B. Among 2016 FDA-approved drugs screened to target the site, two interacting with the site most favorably, confirmed by MD simulations, are found to inhibit ATG4B biochemically and be tumor suppressive in colorectal, pancreatic and breast cancer cell lines with an observed additive therapeutic effect when co-used with an active-site inhibitor.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.4%
5
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
7
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
10
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Biophysics and Physicobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
18
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
25
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
28
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.5%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%