Back

A survey of biosecurity measures applied on dairy cattle farms in Spain

Vilaamil, J.; Arnaiz, I.; Allepuz, A.; Molins, M.; Lazaro, M.; Benavides, B.; Moya, S. J.; Casal, J.; Yus, E.; Dieguez, F. J.

2019-06-17 epidemiology
10.1101/673996 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Attention to biosecurity has been highlighted as the most important measure to reduce and prevent the introduction of diseases to farms. There is little published information about the biosecurity of dairy cattle in Spain. We therefore aimed to assess and characterize the current application of biosecurity measures on dairy cattle farms in Spain, and relate these to bovine viral diarrhea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis. From July 2017 to April 2018, data on biosecurity measures for 124 dairy herds were collected using a questionnaire. We also assessed the sanitary status of these farms (efficacy of measures implemented against both diseases using antibody ELISA. Data were analyzed descriptively, and using multiple correspondence analysis and a two-step cluster analysis. Measures to prevent disease introduction were often poorly implemented. Three main clusters of farms were identified: Clusters 1 and 2 included herds of small and intermediate sizes, respectively. These, particularly cluster 1, showed the most deficiencies in the control of vehicles and visitors. However, individual purchases usually involved low numbers of animals, especially in cluster 2, and animals were tested for bovine viral diarrhea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis at their places of origin or on arrival at farms. Farms in clusters 1 and 2 were frequently under voluntary control programs. Cluster 3 had the largest herd sizes, with somewhat better biosecurity control of vehicles and visitors. However, farms in this cluster also purchased the most animals, sometimes without testing, and hired external workers most often. Farms in cluster 1 showed the best sanitary level, followed by clusters 2 and 3. Collecting data such as these is an important first step to identification of biosecurity shortcomings, and to structuring of adequate follow-up to ensure that measures are implemented correctly on farms in Spain.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.9%
2
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
7
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Journal of Dairy Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
13
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
14
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
17
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
18
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
19
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
20
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
21
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%