JARA: ‘Just Another Red list Assessment’
Winker, H.; Sherley, R.
Show abstract
Identifying species at risk of extinction is necessary to prioritise conservation efforts. The International Union for Conservation of Natures (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is the global standard for quantifying extinction risk, with many species categorised according to population reduction thresholds. We introduce the Bayesian state-space framework JARA (Just Another Red-List Assessment). Designed as decision-support tool, JARA allows both process error and uncertainty to be incorporated into IUCN Red List assessments under criterion A. JARA is implemented via an R package that is designed to be easy to use, rapid and widely applicable, so conservation practitioners can apply it to their own count or relative abundance data. JARA outputs display easy to interpret graphics of the posterior probability of the population trend against the corresponding IUCN Red List categories, as well as additional graphics to describe the timeseries and model diagnostics. We illustrate JARA using three real-world examples: (1) relative abundance indices for two elasmobranchs, Yellowspotted Skate Leucoraja wallacei and Whitespot Smoothhound Mustelus palumbes; (2) a comparison of standardized abundance indices for Atlantic Blue Marlin Makaira nigricans and (3) absolute abundance data for Cape Gannets Morus capensis. Finally, using a simulation experiment, we demonstrate how JARA provides greater accuracy than two approaches commonly used to assigning a Red List Status under criterion A. Tools like JARA can help further standardise Red List evaluations, increasing objectivity and lowering the risk of misclassification, with substantial benefits for global conservation efforts.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing predictive accuracy of species abundance models in dynamic systems 96%
- Dynamic Generalised Additive Models (DGAM) for forecasting discrete ecological time series 95%
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for spatiotemporal shift in demersal fisheries management priority areas in the western Mediterranean 94%
- Evaluating the consequences of common assumptions in run reconstructions on Pacific-salmon biological status assessments 94%
- A statistical censoring approach accounts for hook competition in abundance indices from longline surveys 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models 95%
- Choosing priors in Bayesian ecological models by simulating from the prior predictive distribution 94%
- Using visual encounter data to improve capture-recapture abundance estimates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data 96%
- Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability 93%
- Bayesian areal disaggregation regression to predict wildlife distribution and relative density with low-resolution data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.