Natural variants in C. elegans atg-5 3’UTR uncover divergent effects of autophagy on polyglutamine aggregation in different tissues
Alexander-Floyd, J.; Haroon, S.; Ying, M.; Entezari, A. A.; Jaeger, C.; Vermulst, M.; Gidalevitz, T.
Show abstract
Diseases caused by protein misfolding and aggregation, in addition to cell selectivity, often exhibit variation among individuals in the age of onset, progression, and severity of disease. Genetic variation has been shown to contribute to such clinical variation. We have previously found that protein aggregation-related phenotypes in a model organism, C. elegans, can be modified by destabilizing polymorphisms in the genetic background and by natural genetic variation. Here, we identified a large modifier locus in a Californian wild strain of C. elegans, DR1350, that alters the susceptibility of the head muscle cells to polyglutamine (polyQ) aggregation, and causes an increase in overall aggregation, without changing the basal activity of the muscle proteostasis pathways known to affect polyQ aggregation. We found that the two phenotypes were genetically separable, and identified regulatory variants in a gene encoding a conserved autophagy protein ATG-5 (ATG5 in humans) as being responsible for the overall increase in aggregation. The atg-5 gene conferred a dosage-dependent enhancement of polyQ aggregation, with DR1350-derived atg-5 allele behaving as a hypermorph. Examination of autophagy in animals bearing the modifier locus indicated enhanced response to an autophagy-activating treatment. Because autophagy is known to be required for the clearance of polyQ aggregates, this result was surprising. Thus, we tested whether directly activating autophagy, either pharmacologically or genetically, affected the polyQ aggregation in our model. Strikingly, we found that the effect of autophagy on polyQ aggregation was tissue-dependent, such that activation of autophagy decreased polyQ aggregation in the intestine, but increased it in the muscle cells. Our data show that cryptic genetic variants in genes encoding proteostasis components, although not causing visible phenotypes under normal conditions, can have profound effects on the behavior of aggregation-prone proteins, and suggest that activation of autophagy may have divergent effects on the clearance of such proteins in different cell types.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The conserved ER-transmembrane protein TMEM39 coordinates with vesicular COPII to promote collagen secretion and prevent ER stress 96%
- Inactivation of the mitochondrial protease Afg3l2 results in severely diminished respiratory chain activity and widespread defects in mitochondrial gene expression 96%
- The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling assemblies BAF and PBAF differentially regulate cell cycle exit and cellular invasion in vivo 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The nuclear ubiquitin ligase adaptor SPOP is a conserved regulator of C9orf72 dipeptide toxicity 97%
- Analysis Of Chd-7 Defective Dauer Nematodes Implicates Collagen Misregulation In Charge Syndrome Features. 96%
- The proteasome regulator PI31 is required for protein homeostasis, synapse maintenance and neuronal survival in mice 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitochondrial protein import clogging as a mechanism of disease 96%
- Ataxin-7 and non-stop coordinate SCAR protein levels, subcellular localization, and actin cytoskeleton organization 96%
- A Spatiotemporal Reconstruction of the C. elegans Pharyngeal Cuticle Reveals a Structure Rich in Phase-Separating Proteins 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pathways controlling neurotoxicity and proteostasis in mitochondrial complex I deficiency 96%
- Distinct roles for the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease-causing endosomal regulators Mtmr5 and Mtmr13 in axon radial sorting and Schwann cell myelination 94%
- Uncovering functional insights into human pathogenic variants in CDK19 using Drosophila models 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.