Back

The transcription factor basal regulatory network of Homo sapiens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: uncovering the relationship between topology and phenotype

Hernandez Dominguez, J. L.; Brass, A.; Navarro-Lopez, E.

2019-06-12 bioinformatics
10.1101/669697 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcription factors play a key role in controlling which proteins are made by a cell. As transcription factors are themselves proteins, they are part of a complex interconnected and self-regulated network. We define the transcription factor basal regulatory network (TFBRN) as the network formed by the interactions between transcription factors (TFs) as proteins acting on target genes which are themselves TFs. The question then becomes as to whether topological features of this network are important in determining phenotypes caused by perturbations in TFs. To explore this, we developed two simple TFBRN models; one based on data from human TFs, and the other on the budding yeast. Even from this basic model we did find some very clear correlations between local topological measures and phenotypes seen in cancer and rare genetic diseases. This strongly suggests that the local network architecture of the TFBRN provides important information around the roles of transcription factors and the impacts to an organisation of their perturbation.\n\nAuthor SummaryThe human body is controlled by proteins whose production is coordinated by proteins known as transcription factors. These transcription factors can control multiple proteins, including other transcription factors. Does this network itself play any role in determining the properties of the transcription factors and their roles in cancer and disease? In this paper we find that there is a relationship between the local structures in the network and processes such as cancer and rare genetic diseases. We also found a similar relationship between local network characteristics and budding yeast phenotypes. This work therefore shows that simple properties of the network of interactions between transcription factors and their targets can be useful in determining the effects caused by changes in transcription factors (whether through deletion or allelic variation).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biosystems
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
4
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.5%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
9
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%