Back

In vivo screen identifies LXR agonism potentiates sorafenib killing of hepatocellular carcinoma

Preziosi, M. E.; Zahm, A. M.; Vasquez-Salgado, A.; Ackerman, D.; Gade, T.; Kaestner, K. H.; Wangensteen, K. J.

2019-06-13 cancer biology
10.1101/668350 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Existing drug therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including sorafenib, extend patient survival by only three months. We sought to identify novel druggable targets for use in combination with sorafenib to increase its efficacy. We implemented an in vivo genetic screening paradigm utilizing a library of 43 genes-of-interest expressed in the context of repopulation of the injured livers of Fumarylacetoacetate Hydrolase-deficient (Fah-/-) mice, which led to highly penetrant HCC. We then treated mice with vehicle or sorafenib to discover genetic determinants of sensitivity and resistance. Liver X Receptor alpha (LXR) emerged as a potential target. To examine LXR agonism in combination with sorafenib treatment, we added varying concentrations of sorafenib and LXR agonist drugs to HCC cell lines. We performed transcriptomic analysis to elucidate the mechanisms of HCC death. Fah-/- mice injected with the screening library developed HCC tumor clones containing Myc cDNA plus various other cDNAs. Treatment with sorafenib resulted in sorafenib-resistant HCCs that were significantly depleted in Nr1h3 cDNA, encoding LXR, suggesting that LXR activation is incompatible with tumor growth in the presence of sorafenib treatment in vivo. The combination of sorafenib and LXR agonism led to enhanced cell death as compared to monotherapy in multiple HCC cell lines, due to reduced expression of cell cycle regulators and increased expression of genes associated with apoptosis. Combination therapy also enhanced cell death in a sorafenib-resistant primary human HCC cell line. Our novel in vivo screen led to the discovery that LXR agonist drugs potentiate the efficacy of sorafenib in treating HCC.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hepatology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.8%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.1%
3
JHEP Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
4
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
5
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
8
Journal of Hepatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Molecular Therapy Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Hepatology Communications
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
18
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
21
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
23
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
27
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
30
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%