Back

Molecular basis of calmodulin-dependent calcineurin activation

Sun, B.; Vaughan, D.; Tikunova, S.; Creamer, T.; Davis, J.; Kekenes-Huskey, P.

2019-06-08 molecular biology
10.1101/665158 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Calcineurin (CaN) is a calcium-dependent phosphatase involved in numerous signaling pathways. Its activation by Ca2+ is in part driven by binding of calmodulin (CaM) to a Calmodulin (CaM)-recognition motif within the phosphatases regulatory domain (RD); how-ever, secondary interactions between CaM and the Calcineurin (CaN) regulatory domain may be necessary to fully activate CaN [1]. Specifically, it has been shown that the CaN regulatory domain folds upon CaM binding and that there is a region C-terminal to the canonical CaM-binding region, the distal helix, that assumes an helix fold and contributes to activation [1]. We hypothesized in Dunlap et al [1] that this putative helical distal helix is capable of binding CaM in a region distinct from the canonical CaM binding region (CaMBR) site, whereby CaN is activated. To test this hypothesis, we utilized molecular simulations including replica-exchange molecular dynamics, protein-protein docking and computational mutagene-sis to model distal helix conformations. From these simulations we have isolated a potential binding site on CaM (site D) that facilitates moderate affinity inter-protein interactions that may attenuate CaN auto-inhibition. Further, molecular simulations of the distal helix A454E mutation demonstrated weakened distal helix/CaM interactions that were previously shown to impair CaN activity. K30E and G40D mutations of CaM at site D presented similar de-creases in binding affinity predicted by simulations. The prediction was correlated with a phosphatase assay in which these two mutants show reduced CaN activity. This study there-fore provides a potential structural basis for the role of secondary CaM/CaN interactions in mediating CaN activation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.