Back

Artificial selection on male size depletes genetic variance but not covariance of life history traits in the yellow dung fly

Postma, E.; Teuschl, Y.; Llaurens, V.; Reim, C.; Blanckenhorn, W. U.

2019-06-10 evolutionary biology
10.1101/664326 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolutionary potential of organisms depends on the presence of sufficient genetic variation for traits subject to selection, as well as on the genetic covariances among them. While genetic variation ultimately derives from mutation, theory predicts the depletion of genetic (co)variation under consistent directional or stabilizing selection in natural populations. We estimated and compared additive genetic (co)variances for several standard life history traits, including some for which this has never been assessed, before and after 24 generations of artificial selection on male size in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae) using a series of standard half-sib breeding experiments. As predicted, genetic variances (VA), heritabilities (h2) and evolvabilities (IA) of body size, development time, first clutch size, and female age at first clutch were lower after selection. As independent selection lines were crossed prior to testing, we can rule out that this reduction is due to genetic drift. In contrast to the variances, and against expectation, the additive genetic correlations between the sexes for development time and body size remained strong and positive (rA = 0.8-0.9), while the genetic correlation between these traits within the sexes tended to strengthen (but not significantly so). Our study documents that the effect of selection on genetic variance is predictable, whereas that on genetic correlations is not.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
4
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
6
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
9
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
14
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
16
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
18
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
21
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%