Back

Identification of nutrient deficiency in bean plants by prompt chlorophyll fluorescence measurements and Artificial Neural Networks

Aleksandrov, V.

2019-06-08 biophysics
10.1101/664235 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The deficiency of macro (N, P, S, Ca, Mg and K) and micro (Zn, Cu, B, Mo, Cl, Mn and Fe) minerals has a major effect on plant development. The lack of some nutrient minerals especially of nitrogen, potassium, calcium, phosphorus and iron is a huge problem for agriculture and early warning and prevention of the problem will be very useful for agro-industry. Methods currently used to determine nutritional deficiency in plants are soil analysis, plant tissue analysis, or combined methods. But these methods are slow and expensive. In this study, a new method for determining nutrient deficiency in plants based on the prompt fluorescence of chlorophyll a is proposed. In this paper bean plants are grown on a complete nutrient solution (control) were compared with those grown in a medium, which lacked one of these elements - N, P, K, Ca and Fe. In this article the mineral deficiency in nutrient solution was evaluated by the stress response of the plants estimated by leaves photosynthetic activity. The photosynthetic activity was estimated by analysis of the chlorophyll fluorescence using JIP-test approach that reflects functional activity of Photosystems I and II and of electron transfer chain between them, as well as the physiological state of the photosynthetic apparatus as whole. Next the fluorescence transient recorded from plants grown in nutrient solution with deficiency of N, P, K, Ca and Iron, as an input data in Artificial Neural Network was used. This ANN was train to recognise deficiency of N, P, K, Ca and Iron in bean plants. The results obtained were of high recognition accuracy. The ANN of fluorescence transient was presented as a possible approach to identify/predict the nutrient deficiency using the fast chlorophyll fluorescence records.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.