Electromagnetic mapping of the effects of deep brain stimulation and dopaminergic medication on movement-related cortical activity and corticomuscular coherence in Parkinson’s disease
Sridharan, K. S.; Hojlund, A.; Johnsen, E. L.; Sunde, N. A.; Beniczky, S.; Ostergaard, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundParkinsons disease (PD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disorder. PD can be treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) when dopaminergic medication is no longer a viable option. Both treatments are effective in improving motor symptoms, however, their underlying mechanisms are not fully elucidated yet.\n\nObjectivesTo study the effects of DBS and dopaminergic medication treatments on cortical processing and corticomuscular drive during movements.\n\nMethodsMagnetoencephalography (MEG) was recorded in 10 PD patients and 10 healthy controls, performing phasic hand contractions (hand gripping). Measurements were performed in DBS-treated, untreated and dopaminergic-medicated states; healthy controls received no treatment interventions. Participants performed phasic contractions with their right hand, recorded with electromyography (EMG). Our measures of interest were beta (13-30 Hz) corticomuscular coherence (CMC) and low-gamma (31-45 Hz) power. We used Bayesian statistics on summary values from sensor space data, and we localized the sources of the effects of treatments on beta-CMC and low-gamma power using beamforming.\n\nResultsIn PD patients, DBS led to reduced CMC values, whereas dopaminergic medication increased beta-CMC values (localized to contralateral M1) to even higher levels than the controls. DBS, on the other hand, increased low-gamma power (localized to M1) compared to controls and to other conditions. Yet both treatments had similar beneficial effects on the patients motor symptoms evaluated by UPDRS-III.\n\nConclusionDespite comparable improvements from both treatments on motor symptoms, DBS and dopaminergic medication seem to have different effects on motor cortical function. This indicates that the treatments undertake different functional strategies to improve PD symptoms.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Basal ganglia contributions during the learning of a visuomotor rotation: effect of dopamine, deep brain stimulation and reinforcement 92%
- Overconfidence in visual perception in Parkinson's disease 92%
- Cortical Complexity Alterations in Motor Subtypes of Parkinson's Disease: A Surface-Based Morphometry Analysis of Fractal Dimension 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Movement-related changes in pallidocortical synchrony differentiate action execution and observation in humans 96%
- Neurofeedback-enabled beta power control with a fully implanted DBS system in patients with Parkinson’s disease 95%
- Electrophysiological Correlates of Dynamic Cycling in Parkinson’s Disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduction of spontaneous cortical beta bursts in Parkinson’s disease is linked to symptom severity 97%
- Changes in sensorimotor network dynamics in resting-state recordings in Parkinson’s Disease 95%
- Changes in electrophysiological aperiodic activity during cognitive control in Parkinson's disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential Effects of Pathological Beta Burst Dynamics Between Parkinson’s Disease Phenotypes Across Different Movements 97%
- Simulation of closed-loop deep brain stimulation control schemes for suppression of pathological beta oscillations in Parkinson's disease 93%
- Impairment of Neuronal Activity in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Occurs Early in Parkinsonism 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Altered Cortical Network Dynamics during Observing and Preparing Action in Patients with Corticobasal Syndrome 94%
- Cortico-cortical connectivity is normalised by levodopa in tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease 94%
- Dopamine depletion can be predicted by the aperiodic component of subthalamic local field potentials 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.