Wider pulses and higher intensities increase efficiency of high frequency rTMS
Halawa, I.; Reichert, K.; Sommer, M.; Paulus, W.
Show abstract
IntroductionHigh frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces excitation when applied to the motor cortex as reflected by the increase MEP amplitudes after the stimulation. The effects differ according to pulse width, probably due to higher content of energy in the wider pulses and their ability to cause wider activation in comparison to shorter pulse shapes. Here we focus on the aftereffects generated with high frequency controllable pulse TMS (cTMS) with different pulse widths. ObjectivesTo investigate the influence of pulse energy by using different stimulation intensities and pulse widths on the excitatory plastic aftereffects of high frequency (HF) rTMS. MethodsUsing a controllable pulse stimulator TMS (cTMS), we stimulated the hand motor cortex with 5 Hz rTMS applying 1200 bidirectional pulses with the main component widths of 80, 100 and 120 microseconds. 14 healthy subjects were initially investigated for six randomized sessions first with 80% RMT for anterior-posterior (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA). Then three more sessions using same pulse widths were added for 90% RMT anterior-posterior (AP). Results80% HF rTMS did not produce any significant excitation in either AP or PA direction. 90% RMT AP stimulation with 100 and 120 microsecond-wide pulses were more excitatory, when compared to the 80 microsecond-wide pulses. We also found a correlation between the individual pulse energy and the plastic outcome of each session. ConclusionsHF rTMS with wider pulses is more effective in producing excitatory aftereffects, an effect that correlated with the higher energy content of wider pulses and higher intensity. SignificanceThe findings here suggest that wider pulses are capable of inducing more excitation, a fact that could contribute to better results in future clinical studies performed with wider pulses.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 95%
- The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability 95%
- An in vivo model for transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in awake mice. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Oscillatory Effects of Rhythmic Median Nerve Stimulation 96%
- Towards domain-general predictive coding: Expected TMS excites the motor system less effectively than unexpected stimulation 95%
- Assessment of cortical excitability in awake rhesus macaques with transcranial magnetic stimulation: translational insights from recruitment curves 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theta-burst stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex modulates tactile acuity of tongue 95%
- Response preparation involves a release of intracortical inhibition in task-irrelevant muscles 94%
- Single and paired TMS pulses engage spatially distinct corticomotor representations in human pericentral cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Paired Associative Stimulation Fails to Induce Plasticity in Freely Behaving Intact Rats 95%
- State dependent motor cortex stimulation reveals distinct mechanisms for corticospinal excitability and cortical responses 94%
- Transcranial random noise stimulation of the primary visual cortex but not retina modulates visual contrast sensitivity. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-retest reliability of intrahemispheric dorsal premotor and primary motor cortex dual-site TMS connectivity measures 97%
- Probing the orientation specificity of excitatory and inhibitory circuitries in the primary motor cortex with multi-channel TMS 96%
- Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.