Uncovering bi-directional causal relationships between plasma proteins and psychiatric disorders: A proteome-wide study and directed network analysis
Chau, C. K.-L.; Lau, A. L.-C.; Sham, P. C.; So, H.-C.
Show abstract
Psychiatric disorders represent a major public health burden yet their etiologies remain poorly understood, and treatment advances are limited. In addition, there are no reliable biomarkers for diagnosis or progress monitoring. Here we performed a proteome-wide causal association study covering 3522 plasma proteins and 24 psychiatric traits or disorders, based on large-scale GWAS data and the principle of Mendelian randomization (MR). We have conducted ~95,000 MR analyses in total; to our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study on the causal relationship between plasma proteins and psychiatric traits. The analysis was bi-directional: we studied how proteins may affect psychiatric disorder risks, but also looked into how psychiatric traits/disorders may be causal risk factors for changes in protein levels. We also performed a variety of additional analysis to prioritize protein-disease associations, including HEIDI test for distinguishing functional association from linkage, analysis restricted to cis- acting variants and replications in independent datasets from the UK Biobank. Based on the MR results, we constructed directed networks linking proteins, drugs and different psychiatric traits, hence shedding light on their complex relationships and drug repositioning opportunities. Interestingly, many top proteins were related to inflammation or immune functioning. The full results were also made available online in searchable databases. In conclusion, identifying proteins causal to disease development have important implications on drug discovery or repurposing. Findings from this study may also guide the development of blood-based biomarkers for the prediction or diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, as well as assessment of disease progression or recovery.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunological Drivers and Potential Novel Drug Targets for Major Psychiatric, Neurodevelopmental, and Neurodegenerative Conditions 97%
- Genetic Analysis of Psychosis Biotypes: Shared Ancestry-Adjusted Polygenic Risk and Unique Genomic Associations 95%
- Epigenetic and Genetic Profiling of Comorbidity Patterns among Substance Dependence Diagnoses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are psychiatric disorders risk factors for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity? a two-sample, bidirectional, univariable and multivariable Mendelian Randomization study 95%
- Protein associations and protein–metabolite interactions with depressive symptoms and the p-factor 94%
- Genomic Influences on Self-Reported Childhood Maltreatment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stability of Polygenic Scores Across Discovery Genome-Wide Association Studies 94%
- Whole genome sequence-based association analysis of African American individuals with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia 92%
- Scalable Bayesian functional GWAS method accounting for multivariate quantitative functional annotations with applications to studying Alzheimer’s disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A statistical method for image-mediated association studies discovers genes and pathways associated with four brain disorders 96%
- Accounting for age-of-onset and family history improves power in genome-wide association studies 93%
- Genetic structure correlates with ethnolinguistic diversity in eastern and southern Africa 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic variants associated with cross-disorder and disorder-specific risk for psychiatric disorders are enriched at epigenetically active sites in peripheral lymphoid cells 94%
- Polygenic architecture of brain structure and function, behaviors, and psychopathologies in children 94%
- Genetic correlates of vitamin D-binding protein and 25 hydroxyvitamin D in neonatal dried blood spots 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.