Presynaptic GABAergic receptors modulate inhibitory synaptic feedback in the avian cochlear nucleus angularis
Eisenbach, S. L.; Soueidan, S. E.; MacLeod, K. M.
Show abstract
Inhibition plays multiple critical roles in the neural processing of sound. In the avian auditory brain stem, the cochlear nuclei receive their principal inhibitory feedback from the superior olivary nucleus (SON) in lieu of local inhibitory circuitry. In the timing pathway, GABAergic inhibitory feedback underlies gain control to enhance sound localization. In the cochlear nucleus angularis (NA), which processes intensity information, how the inhibitory feedback is integrated is not well understood. Using whole cell patch-clamp recordings in chick brain stem slices, we investigated the effects of GABA release on the inhibitory (presumed SON) and excitatory (8th nerve) synaptic inputs onto NA neurons. Pharmacological activation of the metabotropic GABAB receptors with baclofen profoundly suppressed both evoked excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs and IPSCs). Baclofen similarly reduced the frequency of spontaneous IPSCs and EPSCs, but had no significant effect on the current kinetics or amplitudes, indicating a presynaptic locus of modulation. Trains of IPSCs showed substantial transient and sustained short-term synaptic facilitation. Baclofen application reduced the initial IPSC amplitude, but enhanced the relative facilitation over the train via changes in release probability. Comparable levels of GABAB receptor mediated blockade also shifted short-term synaptic plasticity of EPSCs toward less depression. Evoked (but not spontaneous) release of GABA was sufficient to suppress basal release at inhibitory synapses in slices. Overall, the modulation of excitatory and inhibitory inputs of NA neurons via GABAB receptor activation appears to parallel that in the timing pathway.\n\nNew and NoteworthyAvian cochlear nucleus angularis (NA) neurons are responsible for encoding sound intensity and provide level information for gain control feedback via the superior olivary nucleus. This GABAergic inhibitory feedback was itself modulated in NA via presynaptic, metabotropic GABAB receptor mediated suppression. Excitatory transmission was modulated by the same receptors, suggesting parallel homosynaptic and heterosynaptic mechanisms in both cochlear nuclei.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Synaptic facilitation enhances the reliability and precision of high frequency neurotransmission 96%
- Differential regulation of prelimbic and thalamic transmission to the basolateral amygdala by acetylcholine receptors 96%
- Axon initial segment GABA inhibits action potential generation throughout periadolescent development 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synaptic plasticity of inhibitory synapses onto medial olivocochlear efferent neurons 97%
- GluN2C/D-containing NMDA receptors enhance temporal summation and increase sound-evoked and spontaneous firing in the inferior colliculus 96%
- Heterogeneity of synaptic NMDA receptor responses within individual lamina I pain processing neurons across sex in rats and humans 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Group II metabotropic glutamate receptors modulate sound evoked and spontaneous activity in the mouse inferior colliculus 96%
- Role of synaptic inhibition in the coupling of the respiratory rhythms that underlie eupnea and sigh behaviors 95%
- Excitatory synaptic transmission is differentially modulated by opioid receptors along the claustro-cingulate pathway 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kv3.3 subunits control presynaptic action potential waveform and neurotransmitter release at a central excitatory synapse 97%
- Distinct forms of synaptic plasticity during ascending vs. descending control of medial olivocochlear efferent neurons 96%
- Physiological roles of endocytosis and presynaptic scaffold in vesicle replenishment at fast and slow central synapses 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.